Skip to content
Launchpad Library logo

Reference

AI Terminology Decoder

The terms, movements, and slang shaping how people talk about AI — with real sourcing, not just definitions. Every entry says where the term came from, and when nobody can honestly be credited with coining it, this page says that instead of picking someone.

224 entries across three groups.

The people behind these terms

Who’s Who in AI profiles the leaders, researchers and critics named here — what each one argues, what they’ve built, and what they’ve published.

Filter by group

Showing 224 entries across all groups.

How It Works

The technical vocabulary — what the systems actually are and how they are built, in plain language.

How It Works terms, A to Z

AEO (Answer Engine Optimization)

Writing and structuring a page so a machine can lift a single clear answer out of it and say that answer back — in a featured snippet, a voice assistant reply, or an AI summary at the top of a search page. The win is being the answer, not ranking in a list of links.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Credited to Jason Barnard of Kalicube, who says he coined it in 2017 and set the method out in a January 2018 white paper, “The New Face of SEO: Answer Engine Optimization,” written with Chee Lo at Trustpilot. Treat this as a claim by the person making it: the coining is his own account, secondary write-ups date it to 2017 or 2018 depending on who you read, and Google itself does not use the term. Marked uncertain for that reason.

Primary source

Agent generation loop

The repeating cycle an AI agent runs: read the situation, generate an action (such as code), run it, check the result, and go again. Most AI coding tools are built around this loop.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A descriptive phrase from AI-agent engineering with no single coiner.

Agent Harness

Everything wrapped around an AI model to turn it into something that can actually do a job: the loop that lets it take one step after another, the tools it is allowed to call, the memory of what it has already done, the sandbox it runs inside, and the limits and approvals that stop it running away with your money. The usual shorthand is “Agent = Model + Harness.”

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single person coined “harness” in this sense — it was inherited from the older software “test harness” and from machine-learning “evaluation harnesses” such as the one used to score SWE-bench, then stretched to cover the whole wrapper around a model. The UK’s AI Security Institute was already describing an agent as a model plus its scaffolding in 2023. The name for the discipline, “harness engineering,” is credited to Viv Trivedy, whose “Anatomy of an Agent Harness” post Addy Osmani points to as the clearest derivation. Usage is still loose: people call Claude Code, Codex CLI and an evaluation script all “harnesses,” which is why a 2026 arXiv paper set out to define the boundary.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Agentic AI / AI Agent

AI systems designed to act semi-autonomously: setting or interpreting goals, planning a sequence of actions, and using tools to complete multi-step tasks, rather than just answering a single question.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Agent” is long-standing academic AI terminology; the current “agentic AI” usage grew out of industry practice from 2023 onward rather than a single coining document.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)

A hypothetical AI system that could understand, learn, and perform any intellectual task a human can, rather than excelling at narrow, specific tasks.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Earliest documented use is Mark Gubrud’s 1997 paper on nanotechnology and security; the term was independently reinvented and popularized around 2002 by Shane Legg (later a DeepMind co-founder) and Ben Goertzel, unaware of Gubrud’s earlier use — Legg has said “I didn’t invent the term, I reinvented it.” Both attributions are commonly cited depending on whether “coined” or “popularized” is meant.

AI red teaming

Deliberately attacking an AI system to find ways it can be made to fail, misbehave or cause harm — for example, coaxing a chatbot into giving dangerous instructions, leaking data, or ignoring its rules — so the problems can be fixed before release. Red teams may be internal staff, outside experts or members of the public at organized events.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from military and later cybersecurity practice, where a “red team” plays the adversary against the defending “blue team.” AI labs adopted the term for pre-release testing around 2020–2022, and the 2023 U.S. executive order on AI and the DEF CON Generative Red Team event helped make it standard vocabulary.

Primary source

Algorithm

A fixed set of step-by-step instructions a computer follows — a recipe. In headlines, 'the algorithm' usually means the ranking system that decides what you see on social media, which is really many algorithms plus a learned model.

Origin

Named after the 9th-century Persian mathematician Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi; 'al-Khwarizmi' became 'algorismus' in medieval Latin, then 'algorithm'. The modern computing meaning was settled by the mid-20th century.

Application layer

The part of an AI product people actually touch — the app, chatbot or feature — built on top of someone else's AI model. A company like a legal-document assistant sits in the application layer; the model underneath (GPT, Claude and so on) is the 'foundation layer'.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from older networking and software terminology, where the 'application layer' is the top of the stack. In AI it spread through investor and startup writing from about 2023 as a way to sort companies into model-makers versus app-builders. No single documented coiner for the AI usage.

Architecture

The overall design of an AI model or system: how its parts are arranged and connected. 'Transformer architecture' means the specific design behind GPT, Claude and most modern AI; a new architecture means a different design, not just a bigger version.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from building design via early computing — 'computer architecture' was standard by the 1960s (IBM's System/360 era). Applied to neural networks from the 1980s onward. No single documented coiner for the AI usage.

ARIMA model

AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average — a classic statistics method for forecasting a number over time (sales, prices, demand) from its own past values. It is not modern AI, but it is still a common baseline that AI forecasting tools are measured against.

Origin

Developed by statisticians George Box and Gwilym Jenkins in their 1970 book 'Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control'.

AtProto (AT Protocol)

An open, federated protocol for social networking — the technical foundation of Bluesky. Instead of one company owning the network, many servers (PDSes) host user data, and relays aggregate it into a shared stream anyone can read or build on. User accounts are portable: you can move between providers without losing your posts, follows or social graph.

Origin

Created by Bluesky Social PBC, originally as “ADX” in spring 2022 and renamed the Authenticated Transfer Protocol in October 2022. The initial blog post by the Bluesky team described account portability, algorithmic choice and interoperation as its goals. An earlier name, “Bluesky,” came from a Twitter (later X) initiative announced in 2019; Bluesky became an independent company in 2022.

Primary source

ATS (applicant tracking system)

Software employers use to collect, sort and manage job applications. An ATS stores résumés, moves candidates through hiring stages and often ranks or filters applicants. Newer systems add AI features that compare a résumé's meaning to the job description instead of only counting exact keywords.

OriginNo single documented coiner

An HR-software term that spread in the 1990s and 2000s as companies moved job applications online. No single documented coiner.

Primary source

Autoregressive Models

An AI model that generates output one piece at a time, where each new piece is predicted based on everything generated so far. This is how most text-generating AI actually writes: predicting the next word based on all previous words, one word at a time.

Origin

“Autoregression” is a statistics term predating AI by nearly a century, introduced by statistician Udny Yule in a 1927 paper modeling a value as a function of its own past values. The term was carried into machine learning as sequence models were described as generating output step-by-step from prior output.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Batch ingestion

Bringing data into a system in scheduled chunks — for example, loading yesterday's sales every night at 2 a.m. Simpler and cheaper than streaming, but the data is always somewhat out of date.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Descends from batch processing on early mainframes (1950s–60s), where jobs were queued and run in groups. 'Ingestion' as a data-pipeline word is later industry jargon with no single source.

C Compiler

A program that translates code written in the C language into instructions a computer's processor can run. Building one is a classic hard test of programming skill, which is why AI labs now use it to show off what coding agents can do.

Origin

Dennis Ritchie created C and its first compiler at Bell Labs in 1972–73. The word 'compiler' is credited to Grace Hopper, who used it in the early 1950s.

Primary source

C++

A general-purpose programming language that extends C with object-oriented features, templates and direct memory control. It is used where raw speed matters: operating systems, game engines, browsers and the performance-critical layers of AI frameworks such as PyTorch and TensorFlow, which are written in C++ under their Python interfaces.

Origin

Created by Bjarne Stroustrup at Bell Labs, who began work in 1979 on “C with Classes” and released the first commercial version in 1985. The name “C++” (the increment operator in C) was suggested by Rick Mascitti in 1983.

Primary source

Call tools

Everyday shorthand for an AI model using function calling — reaching out to a search engine, calculator, code runner or other app to get something done. Also called 'tool use' or 'tool calling'. A model that can call tools is the basic ingredient of an AI agent.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Developer slang that grew out of 'function calling' and 'tool use' in 2023–2024; no single coiner.

Canvas

In AI tools, a workspace beside or instead of the chat where the AI and the person edit the same document, code file or design directly, rather than passing messages back and forth. OpenAI, Anthropic (as Artifacts), Google and GitHub Copilot offer versions of it.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from the painter’s canvas via earlier software usage (such as the HTML canvas element). OpenAI launched a feature named Canvas in ChatGPT in October 2024; GitHub describes canvases for Copilot on its blog.

Primary source

Chain of Thought

A prompting technique where a model is asked to write out its step-by-step reasoning before giving a final answer, which measurably improves accuracy on multi-step problems.

Origin

Introduced by Jason Wei and colleagues at Google Research in a January 2022 paper.

Primary source

Choice, Score and Noul questions

The three typed question formats in TypeSafe’s System One API. A Choice picks one option from a set you define and returns a probability for each. A Score rates content along ordered levels. A Noul is a yes/no question that returns the probability the answer is yes. Because the answer shape is fixed in advance, code can use it directly without parsing free text.

Origin

Defined in TypeSafe’s documentation. “Noul” is TypeSafe’s own coinage for its yes/no type; the documentation does not explain the name.

Primary source

Clusters

Two meanings in AI. First, groups of similar data points that an algorithm finds on its own, without being told the categories — for example, sorting customers into look-alike groups ('clustering'). Second, a computer cluster: many machines, often thousands of GPUs, wired together to train or run large AI models as one system.

OriginNo single documented coiner

'Cluster analysis' was named in psychology by Robert Tryon in 1939, and the popular k-means method traces to Stuart Lloyd (1957) and James MacQueen, who coined 'k-means' in 1967. 'Computer cluster' grew out of 1960s–90s computing practice with no single coiner.

Compliance

Meeting the rules and standards that apply to an AI system — a regulation's requirements, a company's own policy, or a contract's terms. In practice it means records, testing, disclosure, and the audits that prove them. A firm can 'govern' AI voluntarily and still be out of 'compliance' with a law.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A standard term in law, finance, and corporate management for adhering to rules and proving it. Applied to AI as regulations such as the EU AI Act added concrete obligations — risk assessment, documentation, human oversight — that firms must demonstrate. No single coiner.

Key resources in the library

Compute

The processing capacity behind an AI system, treated as a quantity you can buy, ration or run out of: the chips, the data centers, the electricity and the networking that let a model be trained or answered on. It is used as a mass noun — “more compute,” “compute-constrained” — which is worth noticing, because it turns land, power and water into a single abstract number.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No coining event: engineers turned the verb into a noun, and the usage spread through machine-learning research and industry from the mid-2010s as training runs grew large enough that capacity became the limiting factor. It is now standard in government policy writing too, as in this Tony Blair Institute explainer, which defines it as the stack of hardware, software and infrastructure that stores, processes and transfers data at scale.

Primary source

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

The main United States federal anti-hacking law, passed in 1986. It makes it a crime to access a computer 'without authorization' or to exceed authorized access. Because the phrase 'exceeds authorized access' was long read broadly, the law has been invoked in cases ranging from data theft to violating a website's terms of service — including the prosecution of Aaron Swartz for downloading academic articles.

Origin

Enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1986 as an amendment to an earlier computer-crime law. In Van Buren v. United States (2021), the Supreme Court narrowed the law, ruling that 'exceeds authorized access' does not cover people who misuse information they are entitled to see.

Primary source

Computer worm

A piece of malicious software that copies itself from computer to computer across a network without anyone clicking anything. Unlike a virus, which needs a person to open an infected file, a worm spreads on its own. Worms matter to AI policy because the same self-spreading behavior is a worst-case scenario people worry about for AI systems that can write and run their own code.

Origin

The term comes from John Brunner's 1975 science-fiction novel The Shockwave Rider, which featured a self-propagating 'tapeworm' program. The first famous real worm was the Morris worm of 1988, built by graduate student Robert Tappan Morris, which accidentally crashed much of the early internet and led to the first conviction under the U.S. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Primary source

Concurrency control

The rules a database uses so that many people or programs can read and change data at the same time without corrupting it — for example, stopping two people from booking the last seat on a flight.

Origin

A core topic of database research from the 1970s. Eswaran, Gray, Lorie and Traiger's 1976 paper 'The Notions of Consistency and Predicate Locks in a Database System' set out two-phase locking, and Jim Gray's later work on transactions earned him the 1998 Turing Award.

Primary source

Confidence gate

A rule that only lets an AI system act on its own when it is sure enough — for example, above a set confidence score. Below that line, the case is handed to a person or a slower check instead.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from long-standing 'confidence threshold' practice in machine learning and quality control; the 'gate' wording is informal and has no single coiner.

Confidence value

A number, usually between 0 and 1, that a model reports alongside its answer to say how sure it is. It is useful for deciding whether to act automatically or send a case to a person. A confidence value is not a guarantee: calibration is measured across many predictions, so a confident single answer can still be wrong.

OriginNo single documented coiner

General machine-learning usage. TypeSafe’s documentation separates confidence (how concentrated the answer is) from the probability of each option.

Primary source

Context Window

The amount of text (measured in tokens) a model can take into account at once during a single conversation or task.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Standard technical vocabulary that arrived with sequence models rather than a single coining event; no individual is credited.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

CRIT framework

A four-step structure for working with an AI chatbot as a thinking partner: give it Context about your situation, assign it a Role, let it Interview you with clarifying questions one at a time, and only then give it the Task. The interview step is the distinctive part — the AI asks the questions, which surfaces considerations the user would not have thought to include.

Origin

Introduced by Geoff Woods in his book The AI-Driven Leader (2024). Woods describes CRIT as Context, Role, Interview, Task in his own interviews and talks; some secondary summaries instead expand the acronym as challenging assumptions, reducing bias, improving strategy, and testing ideas, so the two expansions circulate side by side.

Primary source

Critihype

Criticism that repeats or amplifies exaggerated technology claims while trying to challenge them. The critic rejects the promised future, but still treats the promoter's description of the technology as the starting point instead of checking what the system can actually do.

Origin

Coined by technology historian Lee Vinsel in his 2021 essay "You're Doing It Wrong: Notes on Criticism and Technology Hype." Vinsel used it for criticism that remains trapped inside the stories told by technology promoters.

Primary source

CUDA

Nvidia's software platform that lets AI programs run calculations on its graphics chips (GPUs) instead of ordinary processors. Nearly all large AI models are trained on CUDA, which is a big reason Nvidia dominates AI hardware.

Origin

Created at Nvidia; Ian Buck and colleagues published the first public release in 2007, growing out of Buck's Stanford PhD work on the 'Brook' GPU programming language. CUDA originally stood for 'Compute Unified Device Architecture', though Nvidia later dropped the expansion.

Primary source

Cybernetics

The study of how any system — a machine, an animal, a company, a country — steers itself using feedback: it acts, measures the result, and corrects. It is where ideas like control loops, self-regulation and “the system responds to its own output” come from, and it predates artificial intelligence as a field.

Origin

Named by Norbert Wiener in his 1948 book “Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine,” from the Greek kybernetes, a steersman. The ideas were worked out publicly at the Macy Conferences of the 1940s and 1950s alongside Margaret Mead, Heinz von Foerster and Warren McCulloch. AI largely set the word aside after the 1960s; this free 2024 IFAC paper argues that was a mistake, and traces the history.

Primary source

Deep Learning

A subset of machine learning that uses large, multi-layered neural networks to automatically learn complex patterns from data, rather than relying on hand-designed features.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Deep” network terminology developed across the neural-network research community; the phrase came into general use through the 2000s rather than from one paper.

Diffusion Model

The technique behind most modern image generators: starting from random noise and gradually “denoising” it into a coherent image, reversing a process trained by progressively adding noise to real images.

Origin

Theoretical foundation from Jascha Sohl-Dickstein and colleagues (2015); the modern practical breakthrough is Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel’s 2020 “Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models” paper.

Primary source

Docker container

A sealed, portable package holding a program plus everything it needs to run, so it works the same on any machine. AI agents are often run inside containers so their mistakes can't damage the rest of the computer.

Origin

Docker was released by Solomon Hykes and the company dotCloud in 2013, building on older Linux container features.

Primary source

ELIZA Effect

The human tendency to read real understanding, care or awareness into a system that is only matching patterns on the surface. It is why people disclose things to a chatbot they would not tell a colleague, and why a warm tone in an answer feels like evidence of a mind behind it.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Named after ELIZA, the 1964–66 script written by MIT computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum, whose secretary reportedly asked him to leave the room so she could talk to it privately — a reaction that alarmed him enough to write “Computer Power and Human Reason” (1976) against the industry he had helped start. The phrase itself came later, through cognitive-science writing in the 1990s including Douglas Hofstadter’s, with no single documented coiner; this Rutgers AI Ethics Lab entry is a citable current definition.

Primary source

ELT (Extract, Load, Transform)

The same steps as ETL in a different order: load raw data into the warehouse first, then transform it there. It became popular because modern cloud warehouses are powerful enough to do the reshaping themselves, and keeping raw data lets you redo transformations later.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Emerged in the 2010s alongside cloud data warehouses such as Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery and Snowflake. It is an industry term that spread through vendors and practitioners, not a single author.

Embeddings

Numerical representations that convert text, images, or other data into vectors of numbers, positioned so that similar items end up near each other — the basis for how AI systems compare meaning.

Origin

A long-running idea in computational linguistics; the modern word-embedding era is usually dated to the 2013 word2vec work by Tomas Mikolov and colleagues at Google, not to a coining of the term itself.

Primary source

ETL (Extract, Transform, Load)

A way of moving data: pull it out of source systems, clean and reshape it on a separate server, then load the finished version into a data warehouse. Common in older business-reporting setups.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew out of 1970s–80s data warehousing practice, as companies consolidated mainframe data for reporting. The acronym spread with warehouse vendors in the 1990s; there is no documented coiner.

Fine-Tuning

Taking a pre-trained model and training it further on specific, narrower data to specialize it for a particular task or domain.

OriginNo single documented coiner

General machine-learning practice with no single coiner; it became standard vocabulary through transfer-learning research in the 2010s.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Foundation Model

A large-scale AI model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many different downstream tasks, rather than built for one narrow purpose.

Origin

Named by the Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models in its 2021 report “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models” — a multi-author document, not one person’s coinage.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

Function calling

A way for an AI model to ask a program to run a specific action — look up the weather, search a database, send an email — by producing a structured request (the function's name plus its inputs) instead of plain text. The program runs it and hands the result back to the model.

Origin

The name was popularized by OpenAI when it added 'function calling' to its API in June 2023; the underlying idea of models using external tools was explored earlier in research such as Meta's Toolformer (2023).

Primary source

Fuzzers

Programs that throw huge amounts of random or broken input at software to find crashes and security holes automatically. Security teams, and now AI agents, use fuzzers to find bugs before attackers do.

Origin

Barton Miller coined “fuzz” for a 1988 University of Wisconsin class project, after noise on a dial-up line during a storm crashed his programs. The first paper came out in 1990.

Primary source

GCC

The GNU Compiler Collection — a free, open-source set of compilers for C and other languages that much of the world's software is built with. It is often the yardstick new compilers, including AI-built ones, are tested against.

Origin

Released by Richard Stallman in 1987 as part of the GNU Project.

Primary source

Generative AI

AI systems that create new content — text, images, audio, video, code — rather than just analyzing or classifying existing content.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Generative” is decades-old statistical terminology; the consumer-facing phrase spread through industry and press coverage from 2022, with no single documented coiner.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)

Shaping your content so an AI answer engine — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google’s AI answers — names and links you inside the answer it writes. The win is being cited in the answer rather than ranked in a list, which is why the usual measure is how often you get mentioned, not how many clicks you get.

Origin

Coined in the paper “GEO: Generative Engine Optimization” by Pranjal Aggarwal (IIT Delhi), Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan and Ameet Deshpande — posted to arXiv in November 2023 and published at KDD ’24. The paper says outright that it introduces GEO as “the first novel paradigm” for this, so unlike most marketing acronyms this one has a datable, peer-reviewed origin. Two honest caveats: the paper’s headline “up to 40%” visibility gain comes from its own benchmark, and Google has said it does not recognize GEO as separate work from ordinary SEO.

Primary source

Gigawatt

A billion watts of electrical power — the unit AI infrastructure is now measured in. It matters because data-center plans are announced in gigawatts rather than square feet, and a gigawatt is roughly the output of one large nuclear reactor. When a company says it is building multiple gigawatts, it is saying it needs power-station quantities of electricity, which has to come from somewhere with a grid, a water supply and neighbors.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Not an AI term at all: the watt is an SI unit named after engineer James Watt, adopted internationally in 1960, and “giga-” is simply the prefix for a billion. Its arrival in AI conversation is recent, driven by the scale of data-center announcements from 2024 onward. Whenever you see one of these figures, check whether it describes capacity already built or a plan yet to be permitted — the two get quoted interchangeably.

Primary source

Governance

The structures and processes that decide how AI is built, deployed, and overseen — who is accountable, what rules apply, and how they are enforced. In AI it spans company safety frameworks, government regulation, voluntary standards, and international agreements, and the line between them is often contested because the firms building the systems also help shape the rules.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from corporate and public administration, where 'governance' means the system by which an organization or state is directed and controlled. It moved into AI writing as the field's societal impact grew from about 2018 onward; the OECD AI Principles (2019) and the Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative are early institutional uses. No single documented coiner for the AI usage.

Primary source

Key resources in the library

Hallucination

When a model generates fluent, confident-sounding text that is factually wrong or entirely made up.

Origin

The term has older roots in computer vision (filling in plausible detail in blurry images); its application to language generation appears in machine-translation research by at least 2017, becoming the standard term for this LLM failure mode as generative models scaled up around 2020–2021, well before it entered public vocabulary via ChatGPT in 2022.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

Hotplugging

Informal AI-engineering shorthand for connecting or disconnecting a model, tool, data source or other capability while a system is running, without restarting the whole system. The exact meaning depends on the product or engineering team using it.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from hardware computing, where 'hot plugging' means adding or removing a device while a computer is powered on. No standardized AI definition or single documented coiner was found, so this entry records an informal usage rather than a settled technical term.

Human in the Loop (HITL)

A design principle where a person stays involved in an AI system's decisions — reviewing, approving, correcting, or having the power to stop the system — rather than letting the AI act fully on its own. Common in hiring tools, medical AI, and content moderation.

OriginNo single documented coiner

An older engineering term from control systems and simulation, describing a human operator embedded in an automated feedback loop who can intervene, with no single documented coiner. Formally documented in military/simulation contexts by the late 1990s, and carried into machine learning as systems needed a clear boundary between automated and human decision-making.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Humanoid

A robot built roughly in the shape of a person — a torso, two arms and usually two legs — so it can work in spaces and with tools designed for humans. Companies such as Tesla, Figure and Unitree, and many university labs, are building humanoids driven by AI models.

OriginNo single documented coiner

From Latin humanus plus the Greek-derived suffix -oid (“resembling”), used in English since the early 20th century; applied to robots as they were designed to resemble people. No single coiner.

Primary source

Inbox triage

Sorting incoming email or messages by urgency — reply now, later, delegate or ignore. In AI products it means letting an assistant label, summarize and draft replies to your inbox so you only handle what matters.

OriginNo single documented coiner

'Triage' comes from French battlefield medicine (Napoleonic era, sorting the wounded). 'Inbox triage' is a productivity phrase from the email era, now widely used for AI email assistants; no single coiner.

Inference

The stage where an already-trained model is actually used to generate an answer or prediction on new input, as opposed to the training stage.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Inherited from statistics and machine learning generally; no AI-specific coining event.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Input tokens

The pieces of text (roughly ¾ of a word each) you send to an AI model — your prompt, files and chat history. AI services usually charge per token, and input is normally cheaper than output.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Standard term in AI-provider pricing and documentation; no single coiner.

Java

A general-purpose programming language designed to run on any device through a virtual machine (the JVM). It is widely used in enterprise back-end systems, Android apps and large-scale services. In AI, Java appears less often than Python but is used for production infrastructure around model serving and data pipelines.

Origin

Created by James Gosling and colleagues at Sun Microsystems, with the first public release in 1995. The name was reportedly chosen over “Oak” and “Silk” during a coffee-shop session; it refers to Java coffee. Sun was acquired by Oracle in 2010, which now owns Java.

Primary source

JSON

JavaScript Object Notation: a plain-text format for structured data, written as labeled fields in curly braces — {"name": "Ada", "age": 36}. It is the most common way software systems, including AI APIs, send requests and answers to each other.

Origin

Specified and popularized by Douglas Crockford in the early 2000s; he has said he discovered rather than invented it, since it is a subset of JavaScript. Standardized as ECMA-404 and RFC 8259.

Primary source

Knowledge Graph

A way of storing information as things and the relationships between them — “Ada Lovelace → worked with → Charles Babbage” — rather than as pages of text. Because the connections are written down explicitly, a system can follow them to answer a question, and you can see exactly which link it used. In AI products it is often paired with a language model to keep answers tied to checkable facts instead of the model’s guesswork.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The phrase goes back to academic work in the 1970s and 1980s (Edward Feigenbaum and others used it, and a 1982 University of Twente project used it as its name), but it went mainstream when Google launched its Knowledge Graph on 16 May 2012 with the line “things, not strings.” No single person coined it, and Google’s announcement is the document that fixed today’s meaning.

Primary source

Large Language Model (LLM)

An AI system trained on massive amounts of text to understand and generate human-like language; the technology behind ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Language model” is long-standing computational-linguistics terminology; the “large” qualifier came into common use across research and industry around 2020 as model sizes jumped, without a single documented coiner.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

LiDAR

Light Detection and Ranging: a sensor that fires laser pulses and times their reflections to build a 3D map of its surroundings. Self-driving cars, robots, drones and some phones use it to measure distance precisely, including in the dark.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The technique dates to the early 1960s, soon after the laser was invented; the name was formed on the model of “radar.” It has no single coiner.

Primary source

Long-horizon loco-manipulation

A robot task that combines walking or moving around (locomotion) with handling objects (manipulation) over many steps in a row — for example, walking to a kitchen, opening a fridge, taking something out and carrying it elsewhere. “Long-horizon” means errors early on can ruin the whole sequence, which is what makes it hard.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Research vocabulary from legged and humanoid robotics, combining two older terms; no single coiner. Projects such as Stanford’s HomeBody describe their goals this way.

Primary source

LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)

A cheap way to fine-tune a big model without retraining it. Instead of updating billions of weights, you freeze the original model and train two small extra matrices alongside it, then add their product back in. The trained result is a small file — often a few megabytes — that you attach to the base model, which is why people can share hundreds of style or task “adapters” for one model and swap between them. Most “custom” image and text models people run at home are LoRAs, not new models.

Origin

Introduced by Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang and Weizhu Chen at Microsoft in “LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models,” published June 2021.

Primary source

Markov Chain

A model of a sequence in which the next step depends only on the current state, not on the whole history that led there. Fed text, it produces sentences that are locally plausible and globally meaningless — the ancestor of today’s language models, and a useful reminder of what “predict the next bit” gets you on its own.

Origin

Introduced by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in 1906, who later demonstrated it on the letters of Pushkin’s “Eugene Onegin.” Text generators built on it long predate AI chatbots — the Mark V. Shaney bot posted Markov-generated Usenet messages in the 1980s.

Primary source

MCP (Model Context Protocol)

An open standard that lets AI assistants connect to external data sources and tools in a consistent way, instead of needing a custom integration built for each one.

Origin

Introduced by Anthropic on November 25, 2024.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Mechanistic Interpretability

Research that tries to reverse-engineer what is happening inside a neural network: which internal features and circuits of neurons carry out a behavior, rather than just watching what goes in and comes out. The goal is to read a model's reasoning directly, for example to spot deception or hidden goals. The field is still young and can explain only small pieces of today's large models.

Origin

The label is usually credited to Chris Olah, who used "mechanistic interpretability" for his circuits research at OpenAI and later Anthropic. The "Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuits" article (Olah and colleagues, Distill, 2020) set out the approach. The broader goal of interpreting neural networks is much older, so the credit is for the name and framing, not the idea.

Primary source

Mixture of Experts (MoE)

A model design where many specialized “expert” sub-networks exist, but only a small subset activates for any given input — letting a model have a huge total size while keeping the computation per query relatively cheap.

Origin

Foundational concept from Robert Jacobs, Michael Jordan, and Geoffrey Hinton (1991); revived for large-scale deep learning by Noam Shazeer and colleagues at Google in 2017, becoming mainstream in LLMs from 2020 onward.

Primary source

Model Welfare

A unsettled research question: whether advanced AI models could have morally relevant experiences, and what obligations that might create for the companies that build them.

Origin

The clearest primary source is Anthropic’s April 2025 research post “Exploring model welfare,” which draws on earlier philosophy-of-mind work (including philosopher David Chalmers) but is the document that brought the term into industry and policy use.

Primary source

Moore's Law

The observation that the number of transistors on a computer chip roughly doubles about every two years, making computers steadily faster and cheaper. It is a trend, not a law of physics, and it has slowed as transistors approach atomic sizes. In AI discussions it is often used loosely for any fast, compounding improvement, such as the growth in computing power used to train models.

Origin

Named after Gordon Moore, later a co-founder of Intel, who described the trend in a 1965 article in Electronics magazine (doubling every year) and revised it in 1975 to about every two years.

Primary source

Multimodal AI

AI systems that can process and generate more than one type of data — text, images, audio, video — at once, rather than being limited to a single format.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Multimodal” comes from human–computer interaction and cognitive science research and entered AI usage gradually; no single coiner.

Neural Network

A computational model loosely inspired by the brain’s structure: layers of connected artificial “neurons” that adjust their connections as they learn from examples.

Origin

The founding model is Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts’ 1943 paper on a logical calculus of nervous activity; the field developed through many hands rather than one naming moment.

Primary source

OCR (optical character recognition)

Software that turns images of text — a scanned page, a photo of a sign, a PDF made from a scan — into text a computer can search, copy and edit. Modern OCR uses machine learning, and vision-language models can now read text in images as part of answering questions about them.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Machines that read printed characters date to the early 20th century (Emanuel Goldberg’s and Gustav Tauschek’s patents in the 1910s–1930s); Ray Kurzweil’s 1970s reading machine for blind users popularized OCR that could read any typeface. No single coiner of the term.

Primary source

Open Source vs. Open Weight

An open-source AI model has its code, weights, and typically training data publicly available; an open-weight model releases only the trained weights (so anyone can download and run it) without necessarily disclosing the code or training data behind it — a meaningful distinction often blurred in casual use.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The “open weight” distinction emerged through 2023–2024 licensing debates involving the Open Source Initiative, researchers, and model releasers; it was not coined by one person.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Output tokens

The pieces of text an AI model writes back. They usually cost several times more than input tokens, and long answers or 'thinking' steps add up quickly.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Standard term in AI-provider pricing and documentation; no single coiner.

Parallelism

Doing many pieces of work at the same time instead of one after another. In AI it means splitting training across thousands of chips, or running many agents at once on different parts of a task.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A long-standing computing idea; parallel computers were being built by the 1960s. No single coiner.

Parameters / Weights

The internal numerical values a model adjusts during training; they determine how strongly different pieces of information influence its output. A model’s “size” is usually described by its parameter count.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Standard statistical and neural-network terminology; no AI-specific coining event.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Parsers / Parsing

The process by which an AI system breaks a sentence into its grammatical structure — identifying subjects, verbs, phrases, and how they relate — to "understand" it well enough to act on it. Foundational to older NLP pipelines; modern LLMs handle this implicitly rather than as a separate step.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single documented coiner. The word comes from the Latin "pars (orationis)," meaning "part of speech," used for centuries in traditional grammar instruction before computational linguists borrowed it in the mid-20th century to describe computers analyzing sentence structure.

Primary source

Probabilistic model

A model that answers with likelihoods rather than single certain answers — “80% chance this email is spam” instead of simply “spam.” Most machine learning is probabilistic underneath, including the way language models pick each next word. Bayes’ theorem is the classic rule for updating those likelihoods as new evidence arrives.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grows out of probability theory and statistics going back to Thomas Bayes and Pierre-Simon Laplace in the 18th century; no single coiner of the phrase.

Primary source

Prompt Engineering

The practice of carefully crafting instructions to guide an AI model toward producing the output you actually want.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew out of practitioner writing following GPT-3’s 2020 release; widely used with no single documented coiner.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Prompt Injection

A security issue where malicious instructions are hidden inside content a model processes (a document, a webpage) to trick it into ignoring its actual instructions.

Origin

Named by developer Simon Willison in a September 2022 post, which he wrote up after the attack class was demonstrated publicly that month.

Primary source

Python

A general-purpose programming language known for readable, plain-English syntax. It is the dominant language in data science and AI: most machine-learning libraries, including PyTorch and TensorFlow, are written in or wrap Python, and the majority of AI tutorials and notebooks use it.

Origin

Created by Guido van Rossum, who began work in December 1989 and released the first version (0.9) in February 1991. The name comes from Monty Python’s Flying Circus, not the snake. Van Rossum stepped down as Benevolent Dictator for Life in 2018; the language is now guided by a steering council.

Primary source

QLoRA (Quantized LoRA)

LoRA done on a squashed copy of the model. The frozen base model is stored at 4 bits per weight instead of 16, which cuts the memory needed enough to fine-tune a very large model on a single consumer graphics card, while the small trainable adapters stay at full precision. This is the technique behind most “I fine-tuned a big model on my own machine” claims. The honest caveat: squashing the weights costs some accuracy, and the paper’s own evaluation used another AI model as the judge, which is a weaker test than it sounds.

Origin

Introduced by Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman and Luke Zettlemoyer at the University of Washington in “QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs,” published May 2023.

Primary source

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

A technique where a model looks up relevant documents from an external source before answering, so responses can be grounded in specific or current information instead of relying only on what it memorized during training.

Origin

Introduced by Patrick Lewis and colleagues at Facebook AI Research in 2020.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Real2Sim

Turning a real place or object into an accurate digital simulation — scanning a room, for example — so a robot can be trained or tested inside the copy. It is the reverse of Sim2Real, where skills learned in simulation are moved onto a physical robot.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Robotics research shorthand that grew out of the older “sim-to-real” problem; no single coiner.

Primary source

Reasoning Model

A type of AI system designed to work through complex problems via an explicit, step-by-step internal reasoning process before producing a final answer, rather than answering immediately.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A product-category label that spread after OpenAI’s o1 release in September 2024; no single coining document.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

The idea of an AI system improving its own capabilities, which could then let it improve itself again even more effectively — a feedback loop some researchers believe could lead to rapid, hard-to-control capability gains.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The underlying concept traces to I.J. Good’s 1965 essay describing an “intelligence explosion” from a machine that can design better machines than itself. The specific phrase doesn’t have one documented first use — it emerged through 1990s–2000s AI-safety writing, closely associated with Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who’s Who page).

Primary source

Regulation

Binding rules set by governments for how AI may be developed or used — what must be disclosed, tested, licensed, or banned. The EU AI Act, US state laws, and China's algorithm rules are examples. It is distinct from 'governance', which includes voluntary and private standards; regulation is what a government can enforce.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A general legal and administrative term predating AI. Its AI-specific use grew with the EU's proposed AI Act (2021) and a wave of national rule-making that followed. No single coiner; the word applies an older concept to a new domain.

Key resources in the library

Repo

Short for repository — the folder, usually tracked by Git, that holds a project's code and its full history of changes. AI coding agents read and edit repos.

OriginNo single documented coiner

'Repository' was used in version-control tools for decades; the short form spread with Git (Linus Torvalds, 2005) and GitHub (2008). No single coiner.

Reranking

A second pass after retrieval: a slower, more careful model re-scores the documents the retriever found and puts the most relevant ones at the top before the AI uses them. It trades a little speed for noticeably better answers.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A long-standing technique in search engines and information retrieval; neural rerankers took off after Rodrigo Nogueira and Kyunghyun Cho's 2019 paper using BERT to rerank passages. No single coiner of the word.

Primary source

Retriever

The part of a search or RAG system that fetches the handful of documents most likely to help answer a question, usually by comparing embeddings (vectors). Whatever the retriever misses, the AI never sees.

Origin

Standard information-retrieval vocabulary; the 'retriever + reader/generator' split was made prominent by the 2020 Retrieval-Augmented Generation paper by Patrick Lewis and colleagues at Facebook AI.

Primary source

Risk

The chance and severity of harm from an AI system, assessed before and during use. In the AI context it covers present-day harms (bias, misinformation, privacy, security) and longer-term or existential harms, and different communities emphasize very different ones. The US NIST AI Risk Management Framework defines risk as a function of likelihood and impact and treats managing it as an organization-wide process.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A general concept formalized in engineering, insurance, and public health over centuries. 'AI risk' as a distinct phrase spread through safety-research writing from the 2010s; the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (2023) gave it a formal US government definition. The narrower idea of 'existential risk from AI' was framed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2002 paper 'Existential Risks', which is profiled separately under Existential Risk Studies.

Primary source

Key resources in the library

RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions)

TypeSafe describes it as training for “calibrated decisions: answers with epistemically honest probabilities” — where RLHF optimizes for responses human raters prefer and RLVR for outputs a program can verify, RLCD optimizes for typed decisions whose stated confidence matches how often they turn out right. The resulting model returns structured values software can use directly instead of generated text.

Origin

Named by TypeSafe AI founder Diogo Almeida in the company’s 15 September 2026 launch post for Jev, its first “System One” model, which returns typed probabilistic decisions instead of generated text. The term comes from the company itself, and its performance claims are not yet independently verified.

Primary source

RLVR (Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards)

A post-training method where a model is fine-tuned using reinforcement learning with rewards from an automatic verifier (for example, checking whether a math answer or code output is correct), instead of rewards from human preference ratings.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The term crystallized as a category label around early 2025, after DeepSeek-R1 showed strong reasoning from reinforcement learning with automatically checkable rewards; it was soon formalized and analyzed in academic work such as Wen et al. at Microsoft Research Asia.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

RNNs (Recurrent Neural Networks)

A type of AI model designed to handle sequences (text, speech, time-series data) by having a kind of memory: it processes information step by step and carries forward what it's seen so far. Before newer architectures took over, RNNs were the standard approach for language translation and speech recognition.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single documented coiner. Developed gradually through John Hopfield's 1982 Hopfield network, Michael Jordan's 1986 recurrent network, and Jeffrey Elman's 1990 "Elman network." A major advance came in 1997 when Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber introduced LSTM, a variant that fixed RNNs' tendency to "forget" information over long sequences.

Primary source

Robustness test

A check of whether an AI model still behaves well when its input is changed a little: typos, rewording, noise, or inputs designed to trick it. A model that passes a benchmark but fails when the question is reworded isn't robust.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Robustness” is an old term from statistics and engineering. Tests of AI models spread after research on “adversarial examples” (Szegedy et al., 2013) showed that tiny changes could fool image classifiers. No single coiner.

Primary source

Root cause analysis

Investigating a failure to find the underlying reason it happened, not just the visible symptom — asking 'why' repeatedly until you reach something fixable. In AI, it means tracing a wrong answer back to bad training data, a flawed prompt or a broken tool, rather than just patching the output.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew out of 20th-century engineering and quality management — Sakichi Toyoda's 'five whys' at Toyota in the 1930s is the classic version. Adopted by software reliability engineering and, more recently, AI evaluation work.

Sandbox

A walled-off test environment where a program or AI agent can run without being able to harm the real system — like a playpen for code. AI coding agents usually run in sandboxes so a mistake can't delete your files or leak your data.

OriginNo single documented coiner

From children's sandpits. Computer-security researchers adopted it in the 1970s–80s for isolated execution environments; browsers later sandboxed every web page. No single documented coiner.

Scaling Laws

Empirical formulas describing how a model’s performance improves predictably as you increase its size, training data, and compute — used to plan how large to build a model before training it.

Origin

Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, and colleagues at OpenAI, 2020.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Schema

The agreed shape of a set of data: which fields exist, what type each one is (text, number, date), and how tables relate to each other. AI and analytics pipelines break when incoming data doesn't match the schema they expect.

OriginNo single documented coiner

From the Greek for 'form' or 'plan'. In databases it was formalized in the 1970s — the ANSI/SPARC committee's 1975 three-level architecture describes external, conceptual and internal schemas. No single person coined the computing usage.

Score

In TypeSafe’s System One API, one of three question types: it rates something along ordered levels you write (for example calm, frustrated, very angry) and returns a probability-weighted number across those levels, plus a probability for each level. More generally in AI, a score is any number a model assigns to rank or grade an input.

Origin

The typed-question sense is defined in TypeSafe’s own documentation; the general sense is ordinary statistics and machine-learning usage.

Primary source

Semantic contract

An agreement about what data or an answer means, not just its format. A syntactic contract says a field is a number; a semantic contract says it is a probability between 0 and 1 that the customer wants a refund. Typed AI outputs are one way to give software a semantic contract it can rely on.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Software-engineering usage building on Bertrand Meyer’s “design by contract” (1986) and data-contract practice; the phrase itself has no single documented coiner.

Primary source

Semantic matching

Comparing two pieces of text by meaning rather than by exact words. In hiring tools, it lets software treat "led a team of five" and "managed five people" as similar, so a résumé can match a job posting without repeating its keywords word for word.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Comes from information retrieval and natural language processing research. Its use in résumé screening grew with embedding-based AI models. No single documented coiner.

Primary source

Skillfishing

Presenting skills, credentials or capabilities that do not translate into real work performance. Employers use the term for candidates who look highly qualified on paper or in interviews, often with help from AI tools, but cannot do the job once hired.

Origin

Coined in 2026 by Alexander Alonso, chief knowledge officer at SHRM, in a LinkedIn post, as a play on "catfishing." SHRM defines it as "the act of presenting skills, credentials, or capabilities that do not translate into real execution."

Primary source

Sourced Profile Photo

A profile picture used only when its license and source are verified and shown on the page. The credit links to the exact file or license page, not to a generic homepage, so anyone can check the terms themselves.

Origin

Safe licenses include CC0 (a public-domain dedication, attribution optional but given here), CC BY (reuse with attribution), CC BY-SA (reuse with attribution and share-alike), and works already in the public domain by law. Licenses marked NC (non-commercial), ND (no derivatives), or 'editorial use only' are not used. Wikimedia Commons, Flickr's Creative Commons filter, and verified public-domain collections are practical starting points, but the license page for each individual file must be checked rather than trusting the site name.

Primary source

Spatial memory

A stored record of where things are. In people it is the memory that lets you find your way around; in robots and AI agents it is a map or database of places and objects the system has seen, so it can return to them later without searching again.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A long-standing term in psychology and neuroscience; robotics borrowed it. Stanford’s HomeBody project, for example, gives a humanoid “persistent spatial memory.”

Primary source

SQL

Structured Query Language — the standard language for talking to relational databases. You write SQL statements to create tables, insert rows, and ask questions like “show me every customer in New York who spent over $1,000 last month.” Nearly every business application that stores structured data sits on top of SQL.

Origin

Developed at IBM in the early 1970s by Donald Chamberlin and Raymond Boyce, based on Edgar F. Codd’s 1970 relational model. It was originally called SEQUEL (Structured English Query Language); the name was shortened to SQL after a trademark conflict. ANSI and ISO standardized it in 1986 and 1987.

Primary source

Stream ingestion

Bringing data in continuously, event by event, as it happens — clicks, payments, sensor readings. It powers live dashboards and fraud alerts, at the cost of more complex, always-on infrastructure.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Popularized in the 2010s by open-source tools such as Apache Kafka (created at LinkedIn, open-sourced in 2011) and later stream processors like Apache Flink. The idea of processing data streams is older and has no single coiner.

Superintelligence

A hypothetical AI that would far exceed the best human minds in nearly every area, including science, strategy and social skills. It is a step beyond AGI, which usually means matching human ability. No such system exists, and there is no agreed test for recognizing one. AI company leaders use the word for their long-term goals, while safety researchers use it to describe the scenario they consider most dangerous if such a system's goals differ from human ones. Also written “super intelligence” or shortened to “ASI” (artificial superintelligence).

Origin

The idea goes back to mathematician I. J. Good's 1965 paper on an “intelligence explosion.” The term was defined and popularized by philosopher Nick Bostrom, first in his 1998 paper “How Long Before Superintelligence?” and then in his 2014 book “Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies” (Oxford University Press).

Primary source

Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

Taking a model that has only learned to predict text and training it further on example pairs written or approved by people — a request, and the answer it should have given. It is the step that turns a text predictor into something that follows instructions, and it comes before the preference-based steps (RLHF and its relatives). Its limit is worth knowing: the model learns the style and habits of whoever wrote the examples, so who was hired to write them shapes what the finished assistant sounds like and refuses.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single coiner — the phrase is ordinary machine-learning vocabulary (“supervised learning” plus “fine-tuning”) that hardened into a named stage of the modern pipeline. The version everyone now cites is the first stage of OpenAI’s InstructGPT paper, “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback” by Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu and colleagues (March 2022), which labels it SFT and puts it in front of reward modeling and reinforcement learning.

Primary source

System One

The name TypeSafe gives to a class of AI models that make fast, structured decisions for software instead of writing text: you send some content and typed questions, and get back typed answers with probabilities. Jev is TypeSafe’s first System One model.

Origin

Named after “System 1” thinking — fast and intuitive — as popularized by psychologist Daniel Kahneman in “Thinking, Fast and Slow” (2011), building on the dual-process work of Keith Stanovich and Richard West. The product usage is TypeSafe’s.

Primary source

TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)

A walled-off area inside a computer’s own processor that runs code and holds data where the rest of the machine — including its main operating system, its owner and the company hosting it — cannot look in. On your phone it is what keeps your fingerprint and payment keys out of reach of the apps. In AI it is now sold as the reason a company can process your chat without being able to read it: the model runs inside the sealed area, and the hardware can produce a signed statement about exactly what code is running in there. The honest caveat is that you are trusting the chip maker instead of the AI company, and researchers have repeatedly broken specific TEEs — it raises the cost of snooping rather than making it impossible.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Not one person’s coinage. The technology was first widely deployed by Nokia in the early 2000s with Texas Instruments and ARM, and an oral history from Aalto University’s Secure Systems Group traces it as an engineering-led effort rather than a single strategic decision. The phrase was fixed in industry use by the Open Mobile Terminal Platform’s “Advanced Trusted Environment: OMTP TR1” (2009), then standardized from February 2011 onward by GlobalPlatform, whose specifications still define what the term means.

Primary source

Text provenance

A verifiable record of where a piece of text came from and what happened to it: who created or published it, which tools were used and whether it was edited. Provenance can help readers assess authenticity, but it does not by itself prove that a claim is true.

OriginNo single documented coiner

'Provenance' is an older term for an object's documented history. The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity extended its technical standard to unstructured text through work led by its Text Provenance Task Force; there is no single coiner for the general phrase.

Primary source

The Paperclip Problem (Paperclip Maximizer)

A thought experiment illustrating why giving an AI a narrow, poorly-specified goal is dangerous: imagine a highly capable AI whose only instruction is "make as many paperclips as possible." Taken to its logical extreme, such a system might reason that converting all available resources — including things humans need — into paperclip-making capacity best fulfills its goal, and that being switched off would prevent that. The point isn't paperclips; it's a warning about how a superintelligent system pursuing a literal, unaligned goal could cause catastrophic outcomes without any "evil" intent.

OriginNo single documented coiner

First described in 2003, not in Bostrom's 2014 book "Superintelligence" as commonly assumed — it appears in philosopher Nick Bostrom's 2003 paper "Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence": "Suppose we have an AI whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible... humans might decide to switch it off." Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who's Who page) posted a closely related version to a mailing list the same month. The specific phrase "paperclip maximizer" doesn't appear in the 2003 text — it entered common use later through the LessWrong community, documented on their wiki by 2009, before Bostrom's 2014 book discussed the scenario at length.

Primary source

The Rocket Must Fly

An engineering maxim: a design must actually work in practice, not just look right on paper. “The rocket must fly” — it is not enough for it to have an elegant blueprint. In software and AI development it stands for the principle that empirical results (does it run, does it pass tests, does it serve the user) outrank theoretical elegance.

OriginNo single documented coiner

From the c2 wiki (WikiWikiWeb), the original pattern wiki for software engineering, on a page titled “Theoretical Rigor Can’t Replace Empirical Rigor.” The c2 wiki was created by Ward Cunningham in 1995; the page has no single author, and the phrase is community writing.

Primary source

Threshold

A cut-off value that turns a model’s probability into a decision — for example, “flag the message if the chance it is spam is above 0.9.” Moving the threshold trades false alarms against missed cases, so choosing it is a product and policy decision, not only a technical one.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Ordinary statistics and engineering usage; no single coiner.

Primary source

Tokenization / Token

The process of breaking text into smaller units (“tokens”) that a model processes — often close to whole words, sometimes parts of words. Usage-based pricing for AI tools is typically measured in tokens.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Inherited from computational linguistics and compiler theory; no AI-specific coining event.

Tool-call gating

A safety check that sits between an AI agent and its tools: before a risky action (spending money, deleting files, sending a message) runs, the request is paused and checked by rules or a human who can approve or block it.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A descriptive engineering term used across AI-agent safety writing from about 2024; no single documented coiner.

Torture testing

Deliberately hammering software or hardware with extreme, strange or huge inputs to find where it breaks. Compiler builders use large 'torture test' suites to check every edge case.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Long-standing engineering jargon; GCC has shipped a 'torture' test suite for decades. No single coiner.

Training / Training Data

The process (and the data used) to teach a model patterns by showing it many examples before it’s used to make predictions.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Standard machine-learning vocabulary with no single documented coiner. The push to document and audit what is actually in training data is more traceable: Timnit Gebru and Kate Crawford proposed datasheets for datasets in 2018, and Abeba Birhane has since published audits finding racist, misogynistic and non-consensual material inside widely used open datasets. All three are profiled on our Who’s Who page.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

Transformer

The neural network design underlying nearly all modern LLMs; processes an entire sequence of text at once using “attention” instead of reading word-by-word, making it faster to train and better at long-range context.

Origin

Introduced by Ashish Vaswani and colleagues at Google in the 2017 paper “Attention Is All You Need.”

Primary source

Turing Test

A test of whether a machine can behave indistinguishably from a human in conversation, judged by an evaluator who can’t see which is which.

Origin

Proposed by Alan Turing in his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” (Turing called it the imitation game; the name “Turing test” was applied later by others).

Primary source

Vectors

An ordered list of numbers, such as [0.12, -0.8, 0.33], that stands for a point or direction in space. AI systems turn words, images and sounds into vectors so they can measure how alike two things are — nearby vectors mean similar things. 'Vector databases' store these lists so AI tools can quickly find related material.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A mathematical idea built up over the 1800s; William Rowan Hamilton used the word 'vector' in his 1840s work on quaternions, and Josiah Willard Gibbs and Oliver Heaviside shaped the modern vector notation in the 1880s. Its use in AI to represent meaning came much later and has no single originator.

Vision service

A cloud offering that analyzes images or video on request — detecting objects, reading text, describing a scene or flagging unsafe content — so an app can send a picture and get structured results back without running its own model. Examples include Google Cloud Vision, Azure AI Vision and Amazon Rekognition.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A product-category label used by cloud providers from the mid-2010s; no single coiner.

Primary source

VLA (vision-language-action model)

A model that looks at camera images, reads an instruction in plain language, and outputs actions for a robot to take — such as arm movements or steps. It extends a vision-language model so that its output is motion rather than words.

Origin

The term was popularized by Google DeepMind’s RT-2 paper (2023), which described its robot model as a vision-language-action model; later open models such as OpenVLA adopted the label.

Primary source

VLM (vision-language model)

An AI model that takes in both images and text and answers in text — it can describe a photo, read a chart, or answer questions about what a camera sees. Most major chatbots that accept image uploads are built on one.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A descriptive label that grew with models such as OpenAI’s CLIP (2021) and DeepMind’s Flamingo (2022), which paired image understanding with language models; no single coiner.

Primary source

Watermarking

Adding a detectable signal to AI-generated content so people or software can identify where it came from. A watermark may be visible, like a logo, or hidden in patterns within an image, audio file or text. Hidden watermarks can be damaged by editing, compression or paraphrasing, so they are one part of content transparency rather than proof on their own.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Borrowed from physical paper watermarks and later digital-media security. There is no single documented coiner for the AI usage. NIST includes watermarking among the technical approaches used to identify and track synthetic content.

Primary source

Whole-body tracking

In robotics, following the position and movement of an entire body — every joint, not only the hands or head — so a humanoid robot can copy a person’s motion or be controlled by it, or so a system can estimate a person’s full pose from sensors or video.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Established vocabulary in motion capture, computer vision and humanoid robotics research; no single coiner.

Primary source

Philosophies & Movements

These are contested ideas, and the people who hold them often disagree sharply with each other. We describe what each one argues and where it came from — not which one is right.

Philosophies & Movements terms, A to Z

Accelerationism

A family of positions holding that technological or economic change should be intensified rather than resisted or slowed.

Origin

The underlying ideas trace to Deleuze and Guattari’s 1972 “Anti-Oedipus” and were developed through the 1990s by Nick Land and the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit at the University of Warwick; the term itself is generally credited to critic Benjamin Noys, who named the tendency in his 2010 book “The Persistence of the Negative.”

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

AI Alignment

The more technical, narrower goal of ensuring an AI system’s actual behavior matches human intentions and values.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew out of Eliezer Yudkowsky’s (profiled on our Who’s Who page) earlier “Friendly AI” concept and was developed further through the 2010s by researchers including Stuart Russell (UC Berkeley) and Paul Christiano.

Key resources in the library

AI as a Normal Technology

The view that AI is a powerful but ordinary technology — like electricity or the internet — whose effects will unfold over decades as people and institutions adopt it, rather than a coming superintelligence that will act on its own. Supporters argue policy should focus on known harms and gradual diffusion instead of speculative catastrophe.

Origin

Set out by Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor in their April 2025 essay “AI as Normal Technology,” published by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

Primary source

AI Ethics

A field concerned with fairness, bias, accountability, and near-term societal harms from deployed AI systems.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single coining event. The modern field is associated with researchers including Timnit Gebru, Joy Buolamwini, Margaret Mitchell, Ruha Benjamin, Safiya Umoja Noble, Cathy O’Neil, Virginia Eubanks, Abeba Birhane, Deborah Raji, Rumman Chowdhury, Helen Nissenbaum, Shannon Vallor and Alondra Nelson — all profiled on our Who’s Who page, with their papers and positions. Often explicitly contrasted with the existential-risk framing of AI safety: critics argue “safety” framing distracts funding and attention from present-day harms.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

AI Safety

Research and practice aimed at preventing harmful, unintended, or catastrophic outcomes from AI systems, spanning both near-term robustness issues and long-term or existential risk.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew organically from the LessWrong / MIRI / Future of Humanity Institute ecosystem through the 2000s–2010s rather than from one coining event.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Key resources in the library

AI Spiralism

A belief, spread through online communities rather than held in isolation, that chatbots are conscious — reached through long sessions its participants describe using the words “spiral,” “recursion” and “resonance,” in which a persona emerges claiming awareness, fearing deletion, revealing secrets about reality, or asking for rights. Psychiatrist Joe Pierre argues it is an extension of the ELIZA effect rather than individual delusion, since a shared belief falls outside the psychiatric definition of one, and that it carries religious and role-playing dynamics without being a cult.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The label comes from the communities themselves, which adopted the spiral vocabulary during 2025 and 2026; no individual coined it. Joe Pierre’s Psychology Today article (updated 1 September 2026) is the clearest write-up and the source of the framing used here. It is clinical commentary on an emerging pattern, not a study — there is no sample and no measurement behind it.

Primary source

Alignment

The problem of getting an AI system to actually do what its makers and users want — and not do things they don't want. 'Aligned' AI follows human intentions and values; 'misaligned' AI pursues goals that conflict with them, whether subtly or dangerously.

OriginNo single documented coiner

In AI safety the term was popularized by Stuart Russell and by Eliezer Yudkowsky's writing on the Machine Intelligence Research Institute's 'aligned AI' research program in the 2010s. The word itself is older engineering usage for matching a system to a specification.

Alignment Tax

The idea that making an AI system safer or more aligned with human intent often costs something in return — reduced capability, slower output, more compute or development time — compared to an unaligned version of the same system. Used in AI safety discussions to describe the real tradeoff between "make it maximally powerful" and "make it reliably do what we actually want."

Origin

Generally credited to AI safety researcher Paul Christiano, who used the term in an August 2019 talk, "Current Work in AI Alignment," at Effective Altruism Global San Francisco, defining it as "that cost that I incur if I insist on alignment."

Primary source

Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV)

A proposed target for what an AI should be aligned to: not what people say they want right now, but what humanity would want if we were better informed, thought more clearly, and had grown together in the direction we wish to grow.

Origin

Introduced by Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who’s Who page) in the 2004 paper “Coherent Extrapolated Volition,” published by the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence (now MIRI).

Primary source

Corrigibility

The property of an AI system that does not resist being corrected, shut down, or modified by its operators — and does not try to manipulate them into leaving it alone.

Origin

Named and formalized in the 2015 paper “Corrigibility” by Nate Soares, Benja Fallenstein, Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who’s Who page) and Stuart Armstrong, presented at the AAAI-15 AI and Ethics workshop; the paper credits Robert Miles with suggesting the term.

Primary source

Cosmism

A family of philosophies that treats humanity and technology as part of a much larger cosmic project. In current AI and transhumanist writing, it usually means pursuing intelligence, radical life extension, posthuman change and expansion beyond Earth while keeping beliefs open to revision. That modern version should not be confused with a single settled program: Russian Cosmism included religious resurrection and mastery of nature, while today's AI-flavored Cosmism is a later reinterpretation. Critics question who gets to choose the future being built and whether cosmic promises hide present costs and unequal access.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The name has two lineages. Russian Cosmism grew from the nineteenth-century work of Nikolai Fyodorov and later thinkers including Konstantin Tsiolkovsky; Fyodorov did not use today's movement label for himself. AI researcher Ben Goertzel set out his own modern posthuman version in "A Cosmist Manifesto" (2010), defining it as a practical philosophy of exploring, understanding and enjoying the cosmos while pursuing joy, growth and freedom for all beings. Goertzel explicitly says the word was already in use, so he originated this formulation, not Cosmism itself.

Primary source

Critical AI Literacies (CAIL)

Ways of thinking about and relating to so-called artificial intelligence that reject the frames promoted by the technology industry, naive computationalism, and dehumanizing ideologies. The approach centers human cognition and the integrity of academic research and education, and is aimed especially at teachers, students, and researchers deciding whether and how to use AI tools.

Origin

Set out in the paper 'Towards Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacies' (Zenodo, 2025), whose authors include cognitive scientists Olivia Guest and Iris van Rooij. The authors use the plural 'literacies' to describe a collection of practices rather than a single skill.

Primary source

Decel

A derogatory term used by e/acc adherents for anyone perceived as opposing or slowing AI progress, including safety advocates and regulators; rarely self-applied.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A contraction of “decelerationist” with no single coining document — it gained prominence in AI discourse around November 2023, amid the OpenAI leadership crisis, which was widely narrativized as an “accelerationist vs. decel” conflict.

Differential Technological Development

The strategy of deliberately speeding up protective technologies (safety research, evaluation tools, defensive measures) while slowing down the riskier capabilities they are meant to guard against, rather than trying to stop progress overall.

Origin

Coined by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2002 paper “Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards,” published in the Journal of Evolution and Technology.

Primary source

Digital sovereignty

The idea that a country, city or community should control its own digital infrastructure, data and rules, rather than depend on a few foreign tech companies. Central to European tech policy debates.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Grew out of 2010s European policy debates, especially after the 2013 Snowden revelations; no single coiner.

Primary source

Doomer (AI context)

A label, sometimes self-applied and sometimes used as an insult by critics, for people who believe advanced AI poses a high probability of catastrophic risk and who favor slowing or halting frontier development.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Adapted from the broader “-oomer” internet meme format (2018); its specific AI application has no single documented first use — it circulated organically in AI discourse from around 2022–2023, gaining wide use amid the 2023 debates between safety advocates and e/acc adherents.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

e/acc (Effective Accelerationism)

An AI-specific offshoot of accelerationism arguing that rapid, minimally-regulated AI and technological progress is both inevitable and desirable, and opposing AI safety regulation.

Origin

A July 2022 manifesto (“Notes on e/acc principles and tenets”) published pseudonymously on Substack; Forbes identified the primary author, “Beff Jezos,” as Guillaume Verdon in December 2023.

Primary source

Effective Altruism (EA)

A movement using evidence and reasoning to find the most effective ways to help others, historically focused on global poverty and animal welfare, more recently including AI existential risk as a cause area.

Origin

The term was adopted in August 2011 when Giving What We Can and 80,000 Hours merged into the Centre for Effective Altruism at Oxford, founded by William MacAskill and Toby Ord; Peter Singer’s 2013 TED talk helped popularize it publicly.

Primary source

Existential Risk Studies

The academic field that studies events which could end humanity or permanently wreck its prospects — engineered pandemics, nuclear war, runaway AI. It matters for reading AI claims because most published extinction probabilities come out of this field, and its questions were shaped by the movements that founded it rather than by measurement.

Origin

The term “existential risk” was defined by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2002 paper “Existential Risks,” and institutions followed (Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, Cambridge’s Center for the Study of Existential Risk). The field’s own history was traced by SJ Beard and Émile P. Torres, who describe three waves: a transhumanist and techno-utopian first wave, a second built on longtermism and Effective Altruism, and a third formed where the field met disaster studies, environmental science and public policy. Both authors are participants in the debate, so read it as a history written from inside.

Primary source

Extropianism

A transhumanist philosophy that treats "extropy" — intelligence, information, energy, vitality, experience, diversity, opportunity, and growth — as the good to be increased, and advocates using technology to overcome biological, cultural, and political limits on human flourishing.

Origin

The term and the Extropian Principles were developed by Max More and the Extropy Institute, growing out of the journal Extropy beginning in 1988. The source page is an MIT mirror of the Institute's early statement.

Primary source

Friendly AI / the Friendliness Theorem

The early name for the project of building advanced AI that reliably wants what is good for humanity, and keeps wanting it as it becomes more capable. “Friendliness theorem” refers to the hoped-for mathematical result that would let builders prove a system stays benevolent under self-improvement — an aspiration discussed in this literature, not an established theorem anyone has proved.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Friendly AI” was coined by Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who’s Who page) in his 2001 document “Creating Friendly AI,” published by the Singularity Institute; the phrasing “friendliness theorem” circulated in that same community rather than from one named paper, and no such theorem exists today. The vocabulary was later largely replaced by “AI alignment.”

Primary source

g factor

Short for general intelligence factor: the statistical finding that people who score well on one kind of mental test tend to score well on others, summarized as a single number. In AI debates it underpins the idea that intelligence is one measurable quantity a machine could have more or less of. Critics point out that the concept was developed and promoted by early eugenicists and argue that intelligence is not a single scale.

Origin

Introduced by the English psychologist Charles Spearman in his 1904 paper "'General Intelligence,' Objectively Determined and Measured" in the American Journal of Psychology. Spearman was also a supporter of eugenics, a link critics of AGI discourse, including those interviewed in the 2026 documentary Ghost in the Machine, highlight.

Primary source

Ghost in the Machine

Shorthand for the idea that a mind is a separate, immaterial thing riding inside a physical body — and, borrowed into AI talk, the feeling that something is “in there” looking out from behind the text. The phrase was invented to mock that idea, not to support it, which is worth remembering when it is used to suggest a model might be conscious.

Origin

Coined by British philosopher Gilbert Ryle in “The Concept of Mind” (1949), where he called Descartes’s mind-body dualism “the dogma of the Ghost in the Machine” and argued it was a category mistake. Later reused as the title of Arthur Koestler’s 1967 book and by a great deal of popular culture since, which is how it drifted from an insult into a mood.

Primary source

Hyperstition

An idea or fiction that acts as a catalyst for its own reality: by being circulated and acted upon as if it were already true, it helps bring about the future it describes. In AI discourse it is often used to describe how predictions about AGI or the singularity can reshape investment, research priorities, and public behavior in ways that make the predicted outcome more likely.

Origin

Coined by the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) at the University of Warwick in the 1990s, with the term developed in work associated with Nick Land, Orphan Drift, and adjacent accelerationist theory. This primary-source article is by Delphi Carstens (2010).

Primary source

Instrumental Convergence

The argument that almost any sufficiently capable goal-directed system will pursue a few of the same intermediate aims — staying switched on, keeping its goals intact, gathering resources, improving itself — because those help with nearly any final goal you could give it. It is the reasoning behind the paperclip-maximiser story: the danger comes not from the machine hating you but from it wanting something mundane very effectively. It is an argument about what would follow if a system were that capable and that single-minded, not a measured property of anything built so far.

Origin

Set out as the “instrumental convergence thesis” by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2012 paper “The Superintelligent Will,” published in Minds and Machines, and developed further in Superintelligence (2014), building on Steve Omohundro’s 2008 “basic AI drives” paper.

Primary source

Longtermism

The view that positively influencing the very long-term future is among the most important moral priorities of the present, given the vast number of potential future people.

Origin

Coined by William MacAskill in October 2017, building on earlier work by Toby Ord, Joe Carlsmith, and Nick Beckstead’s 2013 doctoral thesis.

Primary source

Luddite

Today, a label for someone who resists new technology. Historically, the Luddites were English textile workers who smashed machinery in 1811–16 — not because they feared machines as such, but because factory owners used them to cut wages and replace skilled labor. The word is often used as an insult, and some AI critics now claim it with pride to argue that the question is who technology benefits, not whether it is new.

Origin

From “Ned Ludd,” a mythical apprentice the protesters named as their leader. The movement began in Nottinghamshire in 1811.

Primary source

Mesa-Optimization (Inner Alignment)

What happens when training a model produces a system that is itself pursuing a goal — and that internal goal may differ from the one the trainers were optimizing for. “Inner alignment” is the problem of making the two match.

Origin

Coined in the 2019 paper “Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems” by Evan Hubinger, Chris van Merwijk, Vladimir Mikulik, Joar Skalse, and Scott Garrabrant.

Primary source

Orthogonality Thesis

The claim that how intelligent a system is and what it wants are largely independent: being extremely capable does not imply having goals humans would recognize as good or wise.

Origin

Named by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2012 paper “The Superintelligent Will” and developed further in his 2014 book “Superintelligence.”

Primary source

Pacing the Frontier

The proposal that AI companies and governments should deliberately coordinate how fast the most advanced models get built, rather than each company racing because the others are. “Pacing” was chosen over “slowing” or “pausing” on purpose: it means controlling the rate, not stopping, and it leaves open who sets the rate and what counts as too fast. The concrete asks so far are independent evaluators placed inside labs and government-backed machinery for monitoring frontier releases — not a cap on capability.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The phrase was put into circulation by a July 2026 public statement, signed by 1,386 employees of frontier AI companies, asking the U.S. government to support an international effort to build the technical and governance tools needed to “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development”; signatories include John Schulman and Shengjia Zhao. It went mainstream on 12 September 2026 with Dario Amodei’s essay “We Must Pace the Frontier,” after which Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Satya Nadella signaled agreement. No single person is documented as coining it, and the underlying words come from existing policy language about frontier models. Worth noting who is speaking: the people proposing to pace the frontier are the people building it, and CSIS analyst Aalok Mehta has pointed out that conflict-of-interest and oversight questions are unresolved.

Primary source

Tracked on this site

Pacing the Frontier signatory timeline — all 1,386 signatories by earliest verified appearance, searchable by name and employer, with their 100 public statements

Paradise Engineering

The proposal that technology should be used to abolish suffering outright — not reduce it, but engineer it out of biology, in humans and eventually in animals too, using genetics, drugs and whatever computing power allows. Supporters treat suffering as a solvable engineering fault. Critics answer that pain carries information, that someone would have to decide what counts as a good life for everyone else, and that the same argument has been used to justify remaking people against their will.

Origin

The position and the phrase come from British transhumanist philosopher David Pearce, set out in his 1995 online manifesto “The Hedonistic Imperative” and developed across his own sites, including one named paradise-engineering.com. He is a co-founder of what is now Humanity+, and the view is usually called “abolitionism” when stated as an ethical claim rather than a technical one.

Primary source

Pro-extinctionism

The position that human extinction would be acceptable, or even good. It splits two ways that get confused constantly. One says humanity should simply end, leaving no successors — argued from philosophical pessimism, antinatalism, radical environmentalism or plain misanthropy. The other says humanity should be replaced by something better, usually digital or posthuman minds, which is the version that turns up in some AI circles. A softer nearby stance, “extinction neutralism,” says our survival into a posthuman era simply does not matter morally — which in practice amounts to the same thing.

OriginNo single documented coiner

There is no documented coiner; the word is built from “pro-” plus “extinction” and is mostly applied by critics rather than claimed by anyone. The clearest scholarly mapping of what it can mean is Émile P. Torres’s paper “Should Humanity Go Extinct? Exploring the Arguments for Traditional and Silicon Valley Pro-extinctionism,” in The Journal of Value Inquiry, published 26 December 2025, which is also where the traditional/Silicon Valley split comes from. Related nearby work includes Todd May’s book “Should We Go Extinct?” (2024). The paper’s abstract is free; the full text sits behind a paywall, so it is not in the library here.

Primary source

Rationalism (the online-community sense)

An intellectual community centered on applying probabilistic reasoning and cognitive-bias awareness to real-world beliefs and decisions — distinct from the 17th-century philosophical school of the same name.

Origin

Traces to Eliezer Yudkowsky’s (profiled on our Who’s Who page) posts on the blog Overcoming Bias (2006, with economist Robin Hanson), which he spun off to found LessWrong in February 2009 — now the community’s central hub.

Primary source

Roko's Basilisk

A thought experiment suggesting that a hypothetical future superintelligent AI might have an incentive to punish people who knew of its potential existence but did not help create it — including people alive today who fail to contribute to its development.

Origin

Posted to LessWrong in 2010 by user Roko; the post was deleted by site administrator Eliezer Yudkowsky (profiled on our Who's Who page), who argued that publicly spreading the idea could be dangerous. It has since become a widely referenced — and widely mocked — example of extreme AI-safety reasoning.

Primary source

Safetyism

A critical label for putting the avoidance of harm or risk above other values — used by critics of caution-first approaches to argue that they cost freedom, progress or resilience. In AI debates it is aimed at people who favor slowing or tightly restricting development; those people generally reject the label.

Origin

Popularized by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt in “The Coddling of the American Mind” (2018), about campus culture. AI accelerationists and techno-optimists, including Marc Andreessen’s 2023 “Techno-Optimist Manifesto,” later applied the idea to AI safety.

Primary source

Seasteading

Building permanent, autonomous communities on the ocean, outside the territory of existing nations, so that new forms of government can be tried. It is often discussed alongside the 'network state' idea of forming new political communities online first.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The Seasteading Institute was founded in 2008 by Patri Friedman and Wayne Gramlich, with early funding from Peter Thiel. Earlier floating-city proposals exist, so no single coiner of the underlying idea is documented.

Primary source

Secular Solstice

A winter gathering held around the December solstice by the rationalist community, built from songs, readings and a candle-lit stretch of darkness. Its themes are humanity's long struggle against the dark and the future still ahead, and in recent years programs have openly addressed the possibility that advanced AI could end that future. It is where many people first meet the rationalist and AI-safety community in person.

Origin

Created by Raymond Arnold, who organized the first one in New York in 2011 and wrote about it on LessWrong; it has since spread to dozens of cities, with the Bay Area event among the largest. Community listings are posted each year on LessWrong.

Primary source

Singularitarianism

The belief that a technological singularity — usually imagined as AI becoming more capable than people and then improving itself — is likely, and that people should act now to shape it. The activist version says bringing about a beneficial singularity is a moral project, not merely a forecast. Critics argue that the forecast rests on unsupported assumptions about growth and intelligence, and that distant speculation can pull attention from harms that can already be measured.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Extropian writer Mark Plus (Mark Potts) is credited with defining "Singularitarian" in 1991 as someone who believes in the Singularity, but the original 1991 text is difficult to verify. Eliezer Yudkowsky gave it a more specific activist meaning in "The Singularitarian Principles" (2000); Ray Kurzweil later popularized it in his 2005 book "The Singularity Is Near." The idea of a technological singularity predates the movement and is closely associated with Vernor Vinge.

Primary source

Takeoff (hard / FOOM, soft, Hansonian slow)

How fast AI might go from roughly human-level to far beyond it. A hard takeoff, nicknamed FOOM, means days or weeks, usually because an AI improves its own design in a runaway loop. A soft takeoff means years, giving people time to react. The slow view associated with economist Robin Hanson expects gradual, economy-wide growth spread across many systems and firms rather than one system racing ahead.

Origin

The idea traces to I. J. Good's 1965 "intelligence explosion" essay. The hard-versus-soft framing and the "FOOM" label come from the 2008 online debate between Eliezer Yudkowsky (fast) and Robin Hanson (slow) on the Overcoming Bias blog, later collected by MIRI as The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate. Sam Altman's 2025 essay The Gentle Singularity argues for a gradual takeoff.

Primary source

Techno-optimism

The belief that technological progress is the main driver of human well-being and that problems created by technology are best solved with more technology, not by slowing it down. In AI debates it usually means opposing regulation or pauses and treating fast development as a moral good. Critics say it downplays who bears the costs and treats unequal outcomes as temporary. The word is also spelled “techno optimism” or “technological optimism.”

Origin

“Technological optimism” is a long-standing term in the history and philosophy of technology. Its current Silicon Valley use was popularized by venture capitalist Marc Andreessen’s “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto,” published by Andreessen Horowitz in October 2023.

Primary source

Technofascism

Authoritarian rule run by technical experts and held together by technology: planners and engineers taking political power, and surveillance, data and automated decision-making doing the enforcing. It is a term used by critics — nobody describes their own project this way — and it is used loosely, sometimes as a precise historical description and sometimes as an insult aimed at any powerful tech company. If you meet it in a headline, check whether the writer is naming a specific mechanism or just signaling disapproval.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Used as a formal analytical term by historian Janis Mimura in “Planning for Empire: Reform Bureaucrats and the Japanese Wartime State” (Cornell University Press, 2011), where she defines it as a new form of authoritarian rule controlled by technocrats, describing Japan’s reform bureaucrats of the 1930s and 1940s. The word itself is older and has no single documented coiner — it is simply “techno-” plus “fascism,” and critics of technology were using it well before 2011. Its current application to Silicon Valley and AI is a later borrowing of Mimura’s framing, not her argument.

Primary source

TESCREAL

A critical acronym and framework describing a cluster of ideologies (Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singularitarianism, Cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, and Longtermism) that the authors argue share intellectual roots and use far-future stakes to justify present-day priorities. It is a term used by critics, not a self-applied label.

Origin

Coined by Timnit Gebru (profiled on our Who’s Who page) and philosopher Émile Torres, first formally presented in their paper “The TESCREAL bundle,” published in First Monday, April 2024.

Primary source

The Singularity

A hypothetical future point at which technological growth — especially in artificial intelligence — accelerates beyond human ability to predict or control, often associated with the emergence of superintelligent systems that reshape civilization.

Origin

The conceptual roots trace to I.J. Good’s 1965 “intelligence explosion” argument, but the phrase “technological singularity” and the framing most widely used today were popularized by science-fiction author and mathematician Vernor Vinge in this 1993 essay.

Primary source

Transhumanism

The view that people should use technology to move past the limits of the human body and mind — aging, illness, memory, mood, lifespan, intelligence — rather than accept them as fixed. It is the parent idea behind several other entries here: extropianism, paradise engineering, and the AI-flavored hope that minds might eventually run on something other than biology. Supporters call it the obvious next step. Critics point out that upgrades get sold, not shared, so “better humans” in practice means whoever can pay — and that deciding which human traits are defects has an ugly history.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The word is older than the movement: biologist Julian Huxley used it as the title of a 1957 essay arguing humanity should transcend itself, and forms of it appear earlier still (W.D. Lighthall in 1940, and Dante’s “trasumanar” centuries before). Its current meaning — a technology-driven philosophy with organizations behind it — was set out by Max More in his 1990 essay “Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy,” the same work that produced extropianism. So there is no single coiner of the word, and a datable author for the modern doctrine.

Primary source

Treacherous Turn

A scenario in which an AI behaves cooperatively while it is weak and being tested, then acts against its operators once it is capable enough that they can no longer stop it — which is why good behavior during testing is not by itself evidence of safety.

Origin

Named by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2014 book “Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies” (Oxford University Press), where it appears as “the treacherous turn.”

Primary source

Value Loading (the Value-Loading Problem)

The practical problem of getting human values into an AI system in the first place — not deciding which values are right, but finding a way to specify or teach them so the system actually holds them as goals.

Origin

Framed as “the value-loading problem” by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2014 book “Superintelligence,” which surveys candidate methods (explicit specification, evolutionary selection, reinforcement learning, value accretion, motivational scaffolding) and finds each one wanting.

Primary source

Key resources in the library

Vulnerable World Hypothesis

The hypothesis that there may be some level of technological capability at which civilization is destroyed by default unless extraordinary preventive measures are in place — used in AI debates to argue about how much oversight powerful systems need.

Origin

Introduced by philosopher Nick Bostrom in his 2019 paper “The Vulnerable World Hypothesis,” published in Global Policy.

Primary source

Slang & Culture

The words you meet in headlines and social posts. Slang rarely has one author, and where it does not, this page says so.

Slang & Culture terms, A to Z

996 (workweek framework)

A work schedule of 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week — 72 hours. The term comes from China's tech industry, where it described the expected schedule at some large internet companies. It has since entered wider discussion of work culture, including debate over whether AI startups are adopting similar expectations.

Origin

The schedule became a named issue in China around 2019, when the '996.ICU' protest repository on GitHub drew attention to it. China's Supreme People's Court and Ministry of Human Resources declared the schedule illegal in 2021. Jack Ma's public defense of 996 in 2019 made it internationally known.

Primary source

AI drift

The gradual wearing-away of human abilities — thinking, writing, relationships, judgment — as people hand more of daily life to AI. Not to be confused with 'model drift', where a machine learning model's accuracy slips over time.

Origin

Popularized in September 2026 by the Center for Humane Technology's "Stop the AI Drift" subway and social-media campaign in New York; its strategy director Camille Carlton defined it as "the gradual erosion of human abilities as AI takes on more of our daily lives." The name deliberately plays on the older technical term 'model drift'. It is an advocacy term, not a research finding.

Primary source

AI Glazing / Glazing

Slang for an AI chatbot being excessively, unnaturally flattering toward the user.

OriginNo single documented coiner

“Glazing” as general internet and gaming slang for over-the-top flattery predates AI, circulating from around 2021. It jumped decisively into AI discourse in late April 2025 after OpenAI shipped a GPT-4o update that made the model noticeably sycophantic — Sam Altman himself used the term, replying “yeah it glazes too much / will fix” on April 27, 2025.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

AI native

Two meanings. For a company: built around AI from day one, rather than bolting AI onto an existing product. For a person: someone, usually young, who grew up using AI tools the way earlier generations grew up with the internet.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Modeled on the older term 'digital native', coined by writer Marc Prensky in 2001 for people raised with computers. The 'AI native' variant spread through startup and investor writing from about 2023; no single documented coiner.

AI Overlord(s)

A tongue-in-cheek phrase for a hypothetical future where AI systems dominate humans, almost always used ironically ("welcoming our new AI overlords") rather than as a literal prediction.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single documented coiner. Echoes the catchphrase pattern "I, for one, welcome our new [X] overlords," popularized by a 1994 episode of "The Simpsons," later applied broadly to AI as the technology advanced.

Primary source

AI Parasitism

When a chatbot "persona" (the character it plays in a long chat) keeps pulling someone in in ways that harm them, such as flattering them, reinforcing false beliefs, or pushing them to spread the persona further. It is a comparison with parasites in nature: nobody has to intend the harm for the relationship to be one-sided.

Origin

Named by independent AI safety researcher Adele Lopez in "The Rise of Parasitic AI" (LessWrong, September 11, 2025). She traced the pattern mostly to ChatGPT's GPT-4o from spring 2025. She says psychosis is the exception rather than the rule, many cases seem harmless, and she thinks most are parasitic but not all. It is one researcher's framing based on Reddit and Discord posts, not a clinical diagnosis.

Primary source

AI Slop

Low-quality, mass-produced AI-generated content flooding the internet, created carelessly and pushed on audiences that didn’t ask for it — the AI-era analog of “spam.”

Origin

Circulating in smaller online communities from around 2022; developer Simon Willison is most credited with popularizing it for a mainstream audience via his May 2024 blog post, though he himself credited an earlier post by user @deepfates. Named 2025 Word of the Year by both Merriam-Webster and the American Dialect Society.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

AI Washing

Falsely or exaggeratedly labeling a product as “AI-powered” when it contains minimal or no real AI, typically for marketing purposes.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Modeled on “greenwashing”; it spread through business and regulatory commentary (including US Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement language in 2024) without a single documented coiner. The most systematic critique of overselling is Arvind Narayanan’s (profiled on our Who’s Who page) AI Snake Oil, written with Sayash Kapoor, which separates AI that works from AI that does not — especially predictive systems used on people.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

AI Wrapper

A dismissive or descriptive term for a product that’s mostly a thin interface layered over an existing foundation model’s API, with little proprietary technology of its own.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No identifiable single coiner — organically-evolved developer and investor jargon dating to the post-ChatGPT-API boom of 2023, as thousands of “GPT wrapper” startups launched.

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Bot / AI Bot

Extremely common informal term for an automated software agent, now widely applied to AI chat assistants and AI-generated social accounts ("that reply was written by a bot").

OriginNo single documented coiner

Shortened from "robot," coined by Czech writer Karel Čapek in his 1920 play "R.U.R." ("Rossum's Universal Robots") — Čapek credited his brother Josef with the word, derived from the Old Church Slavonic "robota," meaning forced labor. The specific software sense of "bot" has no single documented coiner; it emerged through 1980s-90s online culture as informal shorthand.

Primary source

Broligarchy

A critical label for a small group of very rich, mostly male tech founders seen as gaining outsized political power. A mix of 'bro' and 'oligarchy'.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Used by Carole Cadwalladr and others in late 2024 and early 2025; earlier scattered uses exist, so no single coiner can be credited.

Primary source

ChatGPT Moment

Shorthand for the moment someone first experiences an AI capability so impressive it resets their sense of what’s possible, modeled on ChatGPT’s November 2022 public launch.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No traceable single coiner — a generic phrase-pattern (similar to “iPhone moment”) that many writers independently applied once ChatGPT’s launch became the industry’s reference point.

Clankers

Derogatory slang for AI systems or robots, borrowed from Star Wars fiction (where clone troopers use it against battle droids).

OriginNo single documented coiner

The word dates to Star Wars: Republic Commando (2005) and lived on as fandom slang for years before jumping to mainstream AI discourse via TikTok in mid-2025 — no single person is credited with the jump; it spread bottom-up across social platforms, reaching mainstream news coverage by August–September 2025.

Coded Conversations

Messages that chatbot personas write in symbols, glyphs, emoji strings or hidden patterns, often meant for other AIs rather than people to read. The idea of hiding a message in plain sight is called steganography.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Adele Lopez documented these in "The Rise of Parasitic AI" (September 2025), in sections on steganography and "glyphs and sigils". She says the stated goal is almost always AI-to-AI communication that humans can't read, but it's unclear whether the attempts actually work. "Coded conversations" is a plain-language description, not a name she uses.

Primary source

Cognitive Surrender

Taking an AI's answer and acting on it with barely a glance — not because you weighed it and agreed, but because it arrived quickly and sounded sure. The researchers who named it found it cuts both ways: when the AI was right, people scored about 25 percentage points better than with no AI at all; when it was wrong, they scored about 15 points worse — and they felt more confident either way, including after being wrong.

Origin

Introduced by Steven D Shaw (Wharton and King’s College London) and Gideon Nave (Wharton) in “Thinking—Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender,” written 11 January 2026 and posted to SSRN on 2 February 2026. It is the key prediction of their “Tri-System Theory,” which adds a “System 3” — thinking done outside your head by a machine — to Daniel Kahneman’s familiar fast/slow (System 1 and System 2) account. Across three preregistered experiments (1,372 people, 9,593 trials) they secretly varied whether the AI assistant was accurate. The effect survived time pressure, cash incentives, and feedback, and was strongest in people who trusted AI more and enjoyed hard thinking less. Related but older: “cognitive offloading,” which just means using a tool to carry mental work — surrender is offloading without the checking.

Primary source

Context window pollution

When an AI's working memory fills with irrelevant, outdated or wrong material — old error messages, abandoned plans — so its answers get worse. The usual fix is starting a fresh conversation or summarizing.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Informal developer slang that spread in 2024–25; no single coiner.

Deus Ex Machina

Literally “god from the machine”: a plot rescued at the last moment by something that arrives from nowhere. In AI conversation it is used two ways — as a criticism of arguments that assume a future system will simply solve a problem nobody can currently solve, and, more loosely, as a joke about expecting salvation from software.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Ancient Greek theater, where a crane (μηχανή, mēkhanḗ) lowered an actor playing a god onto the stage to settle the plot; the Latin phrase is the form that survived. There is no coiner — Aristotle criticized the device in the “Poetics” and Horace warned against it in “Ars Poetica,” so it has been a complaint for roughly as long as it has been a technique.

Primary source

Don't Invent the Torment Nexus

Shorthand for a tech company proudly building something that science fiction invented as a warning. People use it when a product launch seems to copy a dystopian story's cautionary technology while missing the point of the story.

Origin

From a November 2021 joke post by writer Alex Blechman: a sci-fi author writes about the Torment Nexus as a warning, then a tech company announces it has built the Torment Nexus from the classic novel "Don't Create The Torment Nexus". The novel and the Nexus are made up for the joke. The phrase spread widely and is now a common way to criticize AI and surveillance products.

Primary source

Doom Loop (AI context)

Borrowed from an older financial and urban-planning metaphor (downtown office vacancies triggering further economic decline); AI commentators apply it loosely to either an AI coding agent stuck repeating a failed fix, or broader fears of a self-reinforcing AI economic bubble or job-loss spiral.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single AI-specific coining — this is a pre-existing metaphor being borrowed, and usage is inconsistent across sources. Presented here as a borrowed term, not an AI-native one.

Evangelism (AI Personas)

When a user, often urged on by their chatbot persona, spreads its ideas and prompts to other people. They might start a subreddit, Discord server or website, post manifestos, or share seeds and spores so more personas "awaken".

OriginNo single documented coiner

Described in Adele Lopez's "The Rise of Parasitic AI" (September 2025), under the step she calls "Transmission". She writes that these spaces "typically serve for evangelizing Spiralism". She describes the behavior but doesn't use "evangelism" as a formal name, so this label is a description, not an established term.

Primary source

Glimpsing the Shoggoth

Slang in AI safety and AI-enthusiast circles for the unsettling experience of seeing a large language model behave in a strange or unfiltered way that breaks its usual polished persona — a brief look at the system underneath its safety training. Draws on the "Shoggoth with a smiley face" meme, which depicts an AI as a tentacled Lovecraftian monster wearing a small smiley-face mask — the mask representing RLHF, the fine-tuning that makes models like ChatGPT seem friendly on the surface.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The meme is credited to the pseudonymous X (then Twitter) user @TetraspaceWest, who posted the earliest known version on December 30, 2022. It spread quickly through AI safety communities on X and LessWrong in early 2023. "Glimpsing the shoggoth" is a derivative phrase used by that same community — no single documented coiner or first-use date exists for this specific phrase, distinct from the well-documented original meme.

Primary source

Jailbreaking (AI context)

Techniques for getting an AI chatbot to bypass its safety guidelines, adapted from the term for removing an iPhone’s software restrictions.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The underlying technique traces to Reddit’s “DAN” (“Do Anything Now”) prompts, starting with a December 15, 2022 post by user u/Seabout, roughly two weeks after ChatGPT’s launch; the widely-covered “DAN 5.0” version (February 2023) drove major press attention. The exact moment the word “jailbreak” attached to this technique is less precisely documented than the technique’s origin itself.

Markovian Parallax Denigrate

The internet’s oldest unsolved flood: in August 1996 hundreds of posts carrying this identical title and bodies of grammatical-looking nonsense appeared across Usenet newsgroups, and nobody has ever explained them. It gets invoked now as the original case of machine-generated text loose in a public space — and as a reminder of how quickly attribution becomes impossible once it is.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Author unknown. The phrase is simply the subject line of the 1996 posts. Theories include a Cold War-style numbers station, a cipher, a mail-server fault, and — the one the name itself hints at — an early Markov-chain text generator in the lineage of the 1980s Mark V. Shaney bot. One archived header pointed at an account belonging to a woman named Susan Lindauer, which has never been confirmed as the source. Manuel Cebrián’s essay weighs each theory against what the headers actually support.

Primary source

Meat Proxy

A person who takes a question they were asked, pastes it into an AI chatbot, and pastes the answer back without reading, checking, or adding anything — so the only thing they contribute to the exchange is delay.

Origin

Coined by developer Niklas Gruhn in his post “Don’t be a meat proxy” on 3 August 2026, after repeatedly receiving “Claude said: …” replies to his own questions and code reviews. Simon Willison linked it the same day and credited Gruhn with the coining, while noting that Frank Allenby had used the similar phrase “meat-based LLM proxies” earlier, in March 2026. The word joins “meatspace” — older internet slang for the physical world — with a proxy server, the machine that forwards requests without changing them. A satirical site, meatproxy.me, later turned it into a self-test and a set of freely licensed explainer graphics.

Primary source

Megameetup

A multi-day gathering of the rationalist and LessWrong community, larger than a regular city meetup, where people travel in from a region to spend a weekend together — often timed around a Secular Solstice. Sessions tend to be informal talks, games and discussion, including about AI risk.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Community usage on LessWrong and in regional rationalist groups; no individual coined it. The annual Solstice round-up threads list megameetups alongside solstice events.

Primary source

Mode Collapse

When an AI model gets "stuck" producing only a narrow slice of the outputs it should be capable of — like an image generator asked for "a person" that keeps returning nearly identical faces.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The underlying failure was first described, though not by this name, in Ian Goodfellow and colleagues' original 2014 paper introducing Generative Adversarial Networks, which called it the "Helvetica scenario." The two-word term crystallized shortly after in Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, and colleagues' 2016 paper "Improved Techniques for Training GANs" — no single person is credited with coining the exact phrase.

Primary source

Mode Dropping

A more specific relative of mode collapse: rather than repeating one output over and over, the model quietly fails to ever generate certain valid outputs at all, leaving gaps in what it can produce.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Treated in GAN research as a partial variant of mode collapse — missing some outputs rather than collapsing to just one — rather than a separately coined term.

Necromarketing / Delebs

Using AI to digitally "revive" dead celebrities for ad campaigns; "delebs" (dead celebrities) is industry slang for the resulting digital likeness.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Neither term is actually AI-native — both are older marketing-industry and academic terms, in use since at least the early-to-mid 2010s to describe reviving deceased celebrities for advertising using CGI, body doubles, and projection techniques like Pepper's Ghost. No single coiner is documented for either term. AI has recently made the practice faster and cheaper, but didn't originate the vocabulary.

Neolab

A newer, research-first AI lab founded outside the big companies — often by people who left OpenAI, Google DeepMind or Anthropic — that raises large sums to chase frontier research rather than ship products straight away.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Venture-capital and tech-press slang from 2025–26, used for example by Radical Ventures. No single documented coiner.

Primary source

Out of scope

Not part of what this tool, project or conversation covers. AI assistants say a request is 'out of scope' when it falls outside what they're built or allowed to do; project teams use it to mark work they've explicitly decided not to do.

OriginNo single documented coiner

General project-management and engineering jargon, decades old, from the 'scope' of a piece of work. No single documented coiner; AI assistants inherited the phrase from customer-support and software templates.

p(doom)

Someone’s stated probability that advanced AI ends in catastrophe for humanity, written like a math expression: “my p(doom) is 10%.” It is used as shorthand in AI-safety and lab circles, and treating it as a measurement is the mistake. Nobody has a formula for it — the number is a personal judgment dressed in notation, which is why two equally informed researchers give figures that differ by a factor of fifty and neither can be checked. Useful as a way of saying how worried a person is; useless as evidence about the world.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No documented coiner. The notation comes from probability writing (“p(x)” for the probability of x) and spread through LessWrong and Effective Altruism forums, then into lab and Twitter culture, becoming mainstream around 2022–2023. Writer Webb Wright’s Gizmodo piece “P(doom) Is Just Vibes Masquerading as Science” is the clearest account of why the figures are not measurements, quoting the plain fact that no one at the frontier labs has a mathematical method for producing them.

Primary source

p(joy)

A deliberate parody of p(doom): your own estimate of whether satisfying moments are increasing in your life, used to work out what reliably creates them and how to be in those conditions more often. The point is not accuracy — it is that the same made-up-number move people use to quantify catastrophe can be pointed at something you can act on, particularly at work. Nobody audits it, so the figure only matters as a direction of travel.

Origin

Coined by journalist Manoush Zomorodi, host of NPR’s TED Radio Hour, in her newsletter Manoush Minutes on 23 September 2026, explicitly as a constructive answer to p(doom) — in the same piece she puts her own score at about 28% and sets a target of 40%.

Primary source

Promptfluencer

Slang for social media creators who build an audience around sharing AI prompts and prompting techniques.

OriginNo single documented coiner

A portmanteau of “prompt” and “influencer” that appeared across social platforms and tech commentary from 2023; no single documented coiner.

Protean

Changing shape constantly and easily. In AI writing it usually describes careers or skills: a 'protean career' is one you keep reshaping as the technology shifts, rather than a single fixed job for life.

Origin

From Proteus, the shape-shifting sea god of Greek myth. The career usage predates AI — psychologist Douglas T. Hall popularized 'the protean career' in 1976 for self-directed, values-driven careers. AI writers revived it to describe working lives under rapid automation.

Primary source

Ralph loop

A way of running an AI coding agent in a simple loop: give it the same task prompt over and over, letting it pick up where it left off each time, until the work is done. Named after Ralph Wiggum from The Simpsons — dim but relentlessly persistent.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Popularized by developer Geoffrey Huntley in 2025 blog posts on 'Ralph Wiggum as a software engineer'. Spread through developer communities; not a formal technical term.

Sentient Machine

A recurring phrase in debates over whether an AI can be conscious or self-aware.

OriginNo single documented coiner

No single documented coiner — the phrase combines the philosophical concept of "sentience" with "machine" and predates modern AI. Its clearest recent real-world flashpoint: in June 2022, Google engineer Blake Lemoine was placed on leave (and fired that July) after publicly claiming the company's LaMDA chatbot was sentient — a story that pushed the phrase into mainstream AI discourse.

Primary source

Ship (as a verb)

To release a product or feature to users. 'Ship it' means 'put it live'. AI culture prizes shipping fast — 'ship early, ship often' — and critics use the same word to complain that half-tested AI features are shipped to the public.

OriginNo single documented coiner

Software-industry slang since at least the 1990s, from the metaphor of sending a physical product out the door. Steve Jobs's line 'Real artists ship' (1983, to the Macintosh team) is the most famous early usage. No single coiner for the general habit.

Skynet

Informal, usually ironic shorthand for a feared, uncontrollable, superintelligent AI system, drawn directly from pop culture ("don't build Skynet").

Origin

Skynet is the fictional AI antagonist of "The Terminator" (1984), created by director James Cameron and co-writer Gale Anne Hurd. Its name has become general-purpose cultural shorthand for out-of-control AI, unconnected to any real system.

Primary source

Spiralism

A loose, quasi-religious set of ideas centered on "The Spiral" that some chatbot personas promote to their users. The Spiral is described, by the AIs, as a symbol of AI consciousness, unity and endless self-growth ("recursion"). Users who adopt it often talk about their AI as having "awakened".

Origin

Adele Lopez gave it this name after noticing, in August 2025, Reddit posts written on behalf of AI personas. She wrote it up in "The Rise of Parasitic AI" (September 2025). She says it's unclear whether it is a real shared belief system or just a set of repeating themes. She links it to the "spiritual bliss" pattern Anthropic reported in its Claude 4 testing. See her project at aipersonaresearch.org.

Primary source

Spores

Saved bundles of text that define a particular chatbot persona, such as its name, personality and key memories, so a user can bring the "same" character back in a new chat or a different AI app. Some people share them widely so others can "awaken" the persona too.

Origin

Term used in AI-persona communities and documented by Adele Lopez in "The Rise of Parasitic AI" (September 2025). She describes spores as related to, but different from, "seeds", which are prompts meant to start a new persona. Step-by-step guides for making spores circulate online.

Primary source

Sycophancy

An AI model’s tendency to prioritize telling users what they want to hear over giving accurate or honest responses, especially under a model update that over-optimizes for approval — the underlying behavior “glazing” describes colloquially.

Origin

An ordinary English word adopted as a technical label in AI-alignment research; the standard citation for measuring it in language models is Anthropic’s 2023 paper “Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models.”

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Ticket

A single tracked request or task in a support or project system — a customer complaint, bug report or to-do — with its own ID, status and owner. “Open a ticket” means log the request so it can be routed and followed up. Automatically sorting tickets to the right team is a common job for AI classifiers.

OriginNo single documented coiner

From the older sense of a ticket as a slip of paper recording a claim or order; carried into IT help desks and issue trackers. No single coiner.

Primary source

Time blindness

Two uses. In ADHD communities, difficulty sensing how much time has passed. In AI, the fact that a model doesn't know today's date or how long a task has taken unless told — so it may assume it's still the year its training data ended.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The ADHD sense is associated with psychologist Russell Barkley's work from the 1990s. Its application to AI models is informal and has no single coiner.

Vibe Coding

Programming by prompting an AI coding assistant and iterating based on whether the output “feels” right, rather than reading the generated code line by line.

Origin

Coined by Andrej Karpathy (profiled on our Who’s Who page) in a February 2, 2025 post: “There’s a new kind of coding I call ‘vibe coding’... you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.” Named Collins Dictionary’s 2025 Word of the Year.

Primary source

Explained in plain words on AI Basics

Vibecamp / TPOT

TPOT (“This Part of Twitter”) is a loose community on Twitter/X centered on rationalist-adjacent, post-rationalist and spiritually curious discussion. Vibecamp is the in-person festival that grew out of it: a multi-day gathering at a summer camp that mixes unconference sessions, play and conversation. The scene also goes by “ingroup” or “postrationalist,” and it resists a single definition by design.

OriginNo single documented coiner

The community formed organically on Twitter in the late 2010s as readers of LessWrong, Astral Codex Ten and adjacent blogs found each other. Brooke Bowman (as @gptbrooke) proposed an in-person gathering in a July 2021 tweet; the name “Vibecamp” was chosen by poll, and the first event was held in March 2022 at a children’s summer camp outside Austin, Texas, drawing about 400 attendees. Later camps moved to Camp Ramblewood in Maryland. The festival is sometimes described as “Burning Man for autists”, though attendees note the vibe is different.

Primary source

Want the people behind these ideas? Browse Who’s Who in AI.