7 free resources on this topic. Everything here is free and hand-picked. You can also search within this topic.
A UC Berkeley news report on a peer-reviewed study, co-authored by Brian Christian and presented at the 2026 Conference on Language Modeling, finding that just 10 minutes of relying on an AI tool significantly impaired participants' ability to focus and persist with difficult tasks after the tool was removed.
The project page for a study finding that AI assistance reduces persistence and hurts independent performance once the tool is removed. Includes the paper and materials.
AI study tool with guided lessons, visual explanations and homework help across school subjects. Has a free tier; a paid Plus plan unlocks more usage.
Turns books and documents into scrollable, bite-sized learning cards with AI summaries and quizzes.
From the site: What is AI smart scrolling? ScrollEd pioneered AI smart-scrolling technology that transforms books into scrollable, bite-sized learning cards with AI summaries and quizzes. Learn faster in 5-minute sessions.
Why I recommend it: The free tier is limited: demo content only, no file uploads, and ads. Pro is $6.99 a month (currently offered free for three months to early members), so treat the free plan as a look around rather than a usable reading tool.
A free structured course in AI alignment and AI governance — readings, exercises and facilitated cohorts. Self-paced version free to anyone.
From the site: Free online courses, grants, and intensive in-person programs from the leading talent accelerator for beneficial AI and societal resilience. Join 10,000+ alumni and start today.
Why I recommend it: The usual route in for people trying to move into safety work. The reading list alone is worth the visit even if you never join a cohort.
A reading layer over Wikipedia: cleaner article pages, hover previews, timelines, and a chat that answers only from the Wikipedia article you are reading and the articles it links to, with every answer linked back to its source.
Why I recommend it: Useful precisely because it refuses to answer from anywhere but Wikipedia — you can check every claim. Still Wikipedia underneath, so treat it as a starting point, not a citation.
A September 2026 working paper by Brian Jabarian (Carnegie Mellon) and Luca Henkel (Erasmus Rotterdam) reporting a field experiment with 70,000 real applicants randomly assigned to be interviewed by a human recruiter or an AI voice agent. Applicants interviewed by AI were 12% more likely to receive an offer, with higher job starts and retention and no drop in on-the-job productivity. Transcript analysis traces the gain to more structured, consistent interviews that still adapt to each applicant.
Why I recommend it: If you have been told AI interviews are stacked against you, this is the largest piece of real evidence so far and it points the other way: consistent, structured questions helped candidates more than a tired recruiter on their eleventh call did. Prepare for them like any structured interview, with clear, specific answers.
Created by Brian Jabarian and Luca Henkel
