AI Hallucination Cases Database
Damien Charlotin's database tracking legal cases in which AI-hallucinated content appeared in court filings.
11 free resources on this topic. Everything here is free and hand-picked. You can also search within this topic.
Damien Charlotin's database tracking legal cases in which AI-hallucinated content appeared in court filings.
A guide to the Americans with Disabilities Act responsibilities for employers.
A curated set of free learning material for legal professionals who want to understand data and AI: primers, courses, tools and reading, gathered in one place.
From the site: Learning Legal Data Science: An Introductory Course on Legal Data Science in R. https://www.youtube.com/embed/iOLLbiW9OPsThe best way to understand what computer science and artificial intelligence can and cannot do in the legal domain is to learn how to program yourself. Acquiring these skills allows you to harness t…
Why I recommend it: A strong starting point if you are in law and feel behind on data and AI. The links are free; some point to external courses that have their own paid upgrades.
Independent, free benchmarks testing leading AI models on real-world finance, software, science and safety tasks, with cost and latency alongside accuracy.
From the site: Private, domain-specific benchmarks in legal, tax, and finance.
Why I recommend it: When someone claims a model is "the best," check here — these are independent evaluations, not vendor marketing.
The stewards of the Open Source Definition, with plain-language explanations of every approved licence and guidance on choosing one for your own project.
Why I recommend it: Read this before you publish code or a template — the license you pick decides what others can legally do with your work.
A border-community legal challenge to a large AI data center project, with filings and updates.
Why I recommend it: Shows what organized local opposition to a data center actually looks like on paper.
A Georgetown law-center project on privacy, records and what happens when everything is searchable.
Why I recommend it: Academic but readable work on privacy and searchable records.
A research group studying how technology is used in refugee and immigration systems, and the legal consequences.
Why I recommend it: Rigorous legal research on automated decisions in immigration.
A legal organization representing people harmed by technology products, including families in mental-health cases against platforms.
Why I recommend it: Where technology harm turns into actual legal claims.
Newsletter and essays on developments at the intersection of AI and the law, by Damien Charlotin, who also tracks AI hallucinations in court filings.
Why I recommend it: The go-to source for how courts are actually handling AI misuse.
What the ADEA actually protects, what employers may and may not ask, and how to file if a line is crossed.
In plain terms: This guide explains federal rules protecting workers and job seekers age 40 and older from age discrimination. You can use it to recognize illegal workplace practices, check reporting deadlines, and learn how to file a complaint.
Why I recommend it: Know the line. Most age bias is not illegal questioning, but it helps to recognize when it is.