Executive recruiter writing about how search firms really screen candidates, plus LinkedIn and job-search tactics.
In plain terms: An executive recruiter shares what happens behind the curtain of a search process and how to run a tighter job search. Aimed at experienced and senior professionals.
From the site: Executive recruiter by day and LinkedIn expert by night, giving executives a peek behind the executive search curtain and helping them run an efficient job search.
Why I recommend it: Follow someone who sits on the hiring side. His posts explain what recruiters skip past in seconds, which is hard to learn any other way.
The Ludwig Institute's alternative unemployment measure that counts people who are jobless, underemployed, or earning below a living wage.
In plain terms: A research institute publishes a "true rate of unemployment" that counts anyone jobless, stuck in part-time work, or earning under a living wage. The number is usually far higher than the official rate, which explains why a "strong" job market can still feel impossible.
From the site: LISEP’s mission is to help achieve shared economic prosperity for all Americans, particularly for middle- and low-income families. Our focus is fact-based economic and policy research.
Why I recommend it: When headlines say the job market is strong and your search still feels brutal, this number explains the gap. Useful language for interviews and for your own sanity.
A widely-discussed thread where job seekers diagnose why high application volume produces no interviews, with practical fixes in the replies.
In plain terms: A Reddit thread from someone with hundreds of applications and zero interviews, plus crowd-sourced diagnoses in the comments. The recurring advice: tighten your resume to the posting, apply to fewer roles, and add one human contact per application.
Why I recommend it: Volume is not a strategy. Skim the replies for the pattern: fewer, better-targeted applications plus one human contact per role beats 300 cold submits.
