Ex-GitHub CEO Bets the Pull Request Is Dead
A daily.dev roundup of reactions to Entire, a Git forge for agent-human collaboration launched by former GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke, including investor Gergely Orosz's stated reasons for backing it.
8 free resources on this topic. Everything here is free and hand-picked. You can also search within this topic.
A daily.dev roundup of reactions to Entire, a Git forge for agent-human collaboration launched by former GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke, including investor Gergely Orosz's stated reasons for backing it.
Jovi De Croock describes an open-source agent-native Git platform organized around human-approved plans, evidence-based review lanes, merge queues and reversible releases. The article discusses prototype limitations and proposed development practices rather than independently verified production results.
MIT-licensed Git platform by Jovi De Croock for plan-driven development, agent-assisted review, merge queues and controlled rollout. The repository provides source and deployment instructions. Software access is free; hosting and any model services used may cost money.
Anthropic's Claude Code team describes risk-layered review, automated checks, human approval, merge queues and rollback. It reports more merged pull requests and fewer reverts over June–September; these are the team's own results, not an independent study.
Free, open-source Git hook that pauses protected-branch pushes to ask questions about what the changed code does. Supports plain Git and several coding-agent workflows. The software is free; use of an external model endpoint may incur separate costs.
OpenAI's official guide to configuring Codex code and security reviews for GitHub pull requests, including automatic reviews and custom repository instructions.
A September 9, 2025 blog post saying Veracode's research found security flaws in 45% of AI-generated code it tested, and giving advice on checking AI-written code before shipping it.
Why I recommend it: Veracode sells code-security scanning, so it benefits from this finding. The 45% figure comes from its own tests, not independent research. The advice to review AI code still holds.
Lobsters community discussion among working engineers on keeping code review standards and human judgment intact as AI-generated code volume grows.
Why I recommend it: Read the comments as much as the post. This is what hiring managers on engineering teams are actually worried about right now.