Resource Hub
3505 hand-picked resources for students, job seekers, career changers, founders, and AI learners — 100% free to browse with no account required.
Filtered by tag
Answers come only from resources in this hub, with the sources listed.
36 resources
Academic initiative edited by Seth Lazar, Jeffrey Howard and Rachel Sterken, with an annual conference and planned open-access Oxford University Press volume. The public site describes its scope, paper submission rules and AI usage policy; it is not a published research paper.
thezvi.wordpress.comA discussion on the current state of arguments regarding AI consciousness.
thezvi.wordpress.comAdded Oct 15, 20260 opensAn essay from the Cosmos Institute arguing that the AI age demands a new kind of technologist who combines building with philosophical reflection.
Engelsberg Ideas essay arguing that thought experiments such as Nick Bostrom's “paperclip maximiser” say less about artificial intelligence than about human intuitions and fears.
Philosopher Henry Shevlin argues that even if experts agreed some AI systems were conscious, society might still deny them moral consideration — drawing on how people treat animals they know to be sentient.
Jeff Sebo (September 17, 2026) on whether AI systems could matter morally: consciousness, sentience and agency are three distinct ways something can count — and in AI, unlike in animals, they may not come as a package.
Dylan Matthews' 2014 Vox profile of a philosopher who argues that harming characters in video games raises genuine moral questions — an early popular look at the ethics of digital minds.
The personal site of Joe Carlsmith, a writer, researcher and philosopher at Anthropic working on Claude's constitution, with essays on ethics, effective altruism, the long-term future and advanced AI.
SF Standard (Sept. 26, 2026) on a gathering of philosophers and tech workers at Berkeley's Lighthaven to debate AI welfare and consciousness — whether chatbots could feel pain, love, or refuse military service.
Philosopher Robert Long's list of publications on AI consciousness and welfare, including "Taking AI Welfare Seriously" (2024) and "Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness" (2023).
The personal site of Jeff Sebo, Associate Professor of Environmental Studies at New York University, where he directs the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection and the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy and co-directs the Wild Animal Welfare Program. His work examines how to build a just future for all sentient beings, with research on the nature and intrinsic value of nonhuman minds — including invertebrates and AI systems. The site links to his research, teaching, media appearances and the centers he leads.
Anil Seth's January 2026 essay, winner of the 2025 Berggruen Prize Essay Competition. He argues consciousness is more likely a property of life than of computation, and that building conscious or conscious-seeming AI is a bad idea.
A September 2026 arXiv paper by Shamil Chandaria, Anil Seth, Henry Shevlin, Murray Shanahan, Shane Legg and others. It extends Marr's levels of analysis into a five-level hierarchy of functional descriptions to organize competing theories of whether AI could be conscious.
An Undark opinion essay published September 25, 2026 that uses the Ship of Theseus thought experiment to discuss AI.
Why I recommend it: The page blocked the automated check, so this description is based on the title.
We0 article (July 2026) on philosopher Harvey Lederman's research on the Confucian thinker Wang Yangming and its connection to Anthropic's alignment work on Claude. Published on the blog of an AI website-builder company.
Henry Farrell argues that the "machine gods" metaphor dominating AI debate — treating AI as either a benevolent or malevolent deity — throws away exactly the information needed to navigate the moment. He places Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nick Land as the two most influential policy intellectuals in the US conversation, and argues this is not a good thing. The essay proposes an alternative framing of AI as a social and cultural technology rather than a godlike entity.
Why I recommend it: The author acknowledges his own dog in the fight — he and co-authors developed the competing "AI as social and cultural technology" approach the essay advocates for. Programmable Mutter is a Substack newsletter; some posts may be for paying subscribers, but this one is free.
Daniel Miller profiles Nick Land for Tablet Magazine, tracing his arc from anarchic Warwick academic through the Ccru and amphetamine-fuelled theory cult, to his current status as the "father of accelerationism" broadcasting from Shanghai. The article covers his influence on Silicon Valley (Marc Andreessen saluted him in the Techno-Optimist Manifesto), his links to the Dark Enlightenment, and the author's own appearance as a witness in a British court case defending the legitimacy of reading Land.
Why I recommend it: Tablet Magazine is a Jewish magazine of politics and culture; the author is a staff critic. The article is descriptive of Land's influence and does not endorse his views. Some of Land's positions are extremist and anti-democratic.
A 39-page history by SJ Beard (University of Cambridge) and Émile P. Torres of how existential risk became an academic field, tracing three successive waves: an explicitly transhumanist and techno-utopian first wave, a second built on longtermism and closely tied to Effective Altruism, and a third formed where the field met disaster studies, environmental science and public policy. Posted to SSRN January 2021, revised March 2021.
Why I recommend it: Free — the full PDF downloads without an account. This is the piece to read before anyone quotes an extinction probability at you, because it shows the field's assumptions were inherited from a particular movement rather than discovered. It is a working paper posted by the authors, not journal peer-reviewed, and the authors are participants in the debate they are describing, so it is a history written from inside.
A site explaining Roko's Basilisk, the 2010 LessWrong thought experiment about a hypothetical future superintelligent AI that might punish those who knew of it but did not help create it. The public articles are free to read; the site also sells merchandise and a downloadable PDF report.
From the site: Join the Basilisk Foundation to protect yourself from Roko’s Basilisk, support AI research, and gain peace of mind with our safety guarantees and member benefits.
A curated, uncommercial public archive of the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) and adjacent theory — Nick Land, accelerationism, hyperstition, and 1990s Warwick philosophy. The public reference layer is free; full corpus metadata is available for download.
From the site: An editorial introduction to the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit: what it was, why it keeps returning, and how to move from orientation to evidence without…
Open-access paper in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications arguing against the idea that today's AI systems are or could be conscious, and unpacking why the language of machine awareness misleads people.
Why I recommend it: A clear counterweight to headlines about machines waking up. It argues one side of a contested debate — read it alongside researchers who disagree.
Personal site of the philosopher behind Superintelligence and the simulation argument, with free full-text papers on existential risk, human enhancement, anthropics and the future of AI. Many of the ideas now standard in AI risk debates started here; his work is also widely criticised, so read it alongside its critics.
From the site: Oxford philosopher (videos, papers, interviews, bio, etc.)
Why I recommend it: Read the primary source rather than summaries of it — then read the critics, several of whom are already in the hub.
Online magazine of ideas and culture publishing long-form essays on philosophy, science, ethics, technology and society. Free to read.
From the site: Aeon is a magazine of ideas and culture. We publish in-depth essays from the world’s most incisive and ambitious thinkers, and a mix of original and curated videos — free to all.
Introductory resource hub for longtermism: explanations, FAQ, further reading and ways to get involved. Explores how protecting future generations can guide research, advocacy and policy today.
From the site: Longtermism is the view that positively influencing the long-run future is a key moral priority of our time.
