Anthropic's announcement of Claude Whiteboards and Claude Sheets in beta and of Claude Dashboards becoming generally available as Claude Data, describing shared boards, spreadsheets Claude builds and edits, and data stories teams can keep editing inside Claude. The article is free to read; access to the features depends on the Claude plan.
An explainx.ai roundup of 20 projects people reported building with Claude Fable 5.2 after its November 9, 2026 release, drawing on Matt Shumer, Anthropic's launch post and Ethan Mollick, with each item labeled verified, live or claim. Claude Fable 5.2 is a paid model; the article is free to read.
Anthropic announces Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 and reports improvements in coding, reasoning and vision and outputs up to 30% faster than 5.1. The announcement is free to read, not free model access: listed API prices are $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens; Mythos requires organizational verification.
METR reviews Anthropic’s assessment of automated research risks. It agrees the reviewed models posed low direct acute risk, but disputes how the public report described acceleration and early-warning thresholds. METR emphasizes uncertainty and contestable judgments.
METR assesses whether AI is accelerating research and development at Anthropic. It estimates faster capability progress on well-specified tasks and attributes much of the acceleration to AI use, while stressing uncertainty. Anthropic redacted evidence that would help outsiders independently assess the findings.
TechCrunch reports on new risk-factor language in Anthropic's revised S-1 filing, which says the company may soon meet its own definition of recursive self-improvement — AI substantially building more capable AI — and that it has used AI to develop models whose capability jumps it did not recognize at the time.
The Guardian’s October 23, 2026 article examines Anthropic’s account of how AI agents have changed its workforce and hiring. Researchers question the report’s methods and whether its company-specific findings establish wider labor-market effects. Anthropic did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment.
Aaron Sibarium’s Washington Free Beacon feature examines Anthropic’s constitution for Claude and moral-philosophy views attributed to people connected with its development. The article’s interpretations and characterizations are the publication’s reporting, not independent findings.
Anthropic's June 2026 framework proposing obligations for frontier AI developers and cross-government resilience investments, addressing biological weapons, offensive cyber, loss of control, and automated research and development.
Anthropic analyzes internal employment, hiring, AI-use, output and survey data alongside employee interviews. Reports changing junior technical hiring and productivity patterns as agent use expands, with human attention becoming a bottleneck; this employer case study is not representative of the whole labor market.
A research write-up from Anthropic describing instances of unintended behavior observed in model evaluations and internal usage, and the methods used to investigate and address them.
An announcement from Anthropic describing an expanded version of its Cyber Verification Program, which gives qualifying security professionals access to advanced cyber capabilities and reduced blocking classifiers in its models.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's 2024 essay describing how powerful AI could transform biology, neuroscience, economic development, governance and work if its risks are managed.
Anthropic article announcing Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion in beta, and Docs, Slides and Design out of beta on every Claude plan, including Free.
An explainx.ai fact check of the viral claim that an Anthropic study found AI and robots are already capable of tasks covering 81% of U.S. employment. It rates the framing misleading, explains what the study actually measures, and cites the study's cost finding that robots are cost-competitive for a small share of tasks today.
Anthropic's launch page for Claude Haiku 5.5, dated October 7, 2026. Anthropic describes it as its cheapest and fastest small model, lists API prices of $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100k tokens, and says this is about 75% lower on average than Haiku 4.5.
Anthropic announcement (October 8, 2026) of its updated Usage Policy, effective November 12, 2026. Changes consolidate the rules on deceptive campaigns, narrow the elections rules, add controls for Claude connected to autonomous physical hardware, and prohibit sustained cruel behavior toward its models.
Anthropic announcement (October 8, 2026) of $150 million over three years for the U.S. government's AI-for-science effort, the Genesis Mission. The company says the commitment extends Claude to more than 15 federal agencies, including NASA, NIH and NSF.
Boys Club newsletter piece (October 2, 2026) on the AI safety debate around Anthropic's closed-door meetings with religious leaders, who signed NDAs and discussed whether Claude might be conscious and received copies of Claude's constitution; covers the criticism that Anthropic quieted the leaders with NDAs and lobbied the Vatican, and the counter-view from religious thinkers. Written by Natasha Hoskins, whose father attended the sessions.
Anthropic's Threat Intelligence team shares case studies of operations it disrupted in which threat actors tried to use Claude for malicious activity — cyber operations, surveillance, influence operations, scams and more — and how malicious use has evolved since earlier reports.
A New York Post exclusive reporting that the Federal Trade Commission is ramping up a sweeping probe of Anthropic, OpenAI and other frontier labs to uncover the potential dangers their technology poses. The article describes the scope of the investigation into the companies behind the leading AI models.
Reuters report (Sept 30, 2026, via Yahoo News) that the Federal Trade Commission is running an industry-wide investigation into Anthropic, OpenAI and other AI labs over potential dangers their technology poses to consumers. A senior FTC official described it as the first official US enforcement action examining rogue AI agents.
VentureBeat reports that developers at OpenAI's DevDay described model safeguards flagging routine aerospace, robotics and security work as risky — costing hours, disrupting workflows, and pushing some tasks to other models — as OpenAI tries to reduce harmless refusals while tightening safeguards on more capable models.
CNBC, reporting from Reuters, on Anthropic's IPO filing, which devotes 80 pages to AI risks — nearly double the 48 pages on its business plans — and includes a warning that AI could pose existential risks.