Skip to content
Launchpad Library logo

All resources / Technology & Ethics

FreeResearch Paper
Technology & Ethics

Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing

The PDF opens on the site where the paper is published.

Authors
Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Timnit Gebru, Margaret Mitchell, Joy Buolamwini, Joonseok Lee, Emily Denton
Venue
Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed
Published
January 2020
ID
arXiv:2001.00964

Abstract

Although essential to revealing biased performance, well intentioned attempts at algorithmic auditing can have effects that may harm the very populations these measures are meant to protect. This concern is even more salient while auditing biometric systems such as facial recognition, where the data is sensitive and the technology is often used in ethically questionable manners. We demonstrate a set of five ethical concerns in the particular case of auditing commercial facial processing technology, highlighting additional design considerations and ethical tensions the auditor needs to be aware of so as not exacerbate or complement the harms propagated by the audited system. We go further to provide tangible illustrations of these concerns, and conclude by reflecting on what these concerns mean for the role of the algorithmic audit and the fundamental product limitations they reveal.

The authors' own abstract, copied from arxiv.org.

How to cite it

Built from the details listed on this page. Check them against the paper before you submit.

APA
Raji, I. D., Gebru, T., Mitchell, M., Buolamwini, J., Lee, J., & Denton, E. (2020). Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing. Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00964
MLA
Raji, Inioluwa Deborah, et al. "Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing." Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed, 2020, https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00964.
BibTeX
@article{raji2020saving,
  title = {Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing},
  author = {Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell and Joy Buolamwini and Joonseok Lee and Emily Denton},
  journal = {Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed},
  year = {2020},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00964},
}

What it is

Raji and colleagues examine the ethics of the audits themselves: who is photographed, who consented, and what an auditor owes the people in the test set.

Why I recommend it

A rare paper about the ethics of doing ethics work. Free on arXiv.

Topics

Added Sep 19, 2026 · 0 opens