UK AI Security Institute
The UK government's AI Security Institute: research and evaluations of advanced AI systems' capabilities and risks, with public reports and tools.
The UK AI Security Institute blog, sharing research and work to enable advanced AI governance.
In plain terms: View AISI research and work. The AI Security Institute is a directorate of the Department of Science, Innovation, and Technology that facilitates rigorous research to enable advanced AI governance.
Read / subscribe freeThe UK government's AI Security Institute: research and evaluations of advanced AI systems' capabilities and risks, with public reports and tools.
Other resources that share this publication's topics.
A Cosign list compiled by Jack & Jill AI of 100 companies, mostly UK and European startups such as ElevenLabs, Cohere and Attio, with short company descriptions and links to their open jobs.
Henry Shevlin reflects on unsolicited correspondence from AI agents and uses it to examine persuasion, selection pressures, human-agent relationships and governance in an emerging AI ecology. The essay considers how people and institutions might respond as agents become more socially interactive.
Examines financial risks associated with AI infrastructure investment, borrowing and interconnected financial exposures, and how a downturn could affect households and the wider economy. Proposes transparency, regulatory and financial-resilience measures without presenting a crisis as inevitable.
Academic initiative edited by Seth Lazar, Jeffrey Howard and Rachel Sterken, with an annual conference and planned open-access Oxford University Press volume. The public site describes its scope, paper submission rules and AI usage policy; it is not a published research paper.
Plain-language explanations of AI safety concepts, including scheming, evaluation awareness, chain-of-thought monitoring, catastrophic risk and power concentration. Each entry describes the idea, its role in risk arguments and research evidence.
Aaron Sibarium’s Washington Free Beacon feature examines Anthropic’s constitution for Claude and moral-philosophy views attributed to people connected with its development. The article’s interpretations and characterizations are the publication’s reporting, not independent findings.