Malo Bourgon
CEO, Machine Intelligence Research Institute
Malo Bourgon is CEO of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), the Berkeley nonprofit focused on existential risk from advanced AI. He represented MIRI at the U.S. Senate AI Insight Forum on doomsday scenarios in 2023 and argues that current AI-doom fears are justified, warning that autonomous agents capable of building smarter successors could spiral out of control.
Key arguments & positions
- Argues current AI-doom fears are justified: the near-term risk is an autonomous agent capable of developing a smarter agent, spiraling out of control.
- Says AI labs are stuck in a race they cannot escape, because if one group stops, a less responsible group races ahead.
Accomplishments
- CEO of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), the Berkeley nonprofit focused on existential risk from advanced AI.
- Represented MIRI at the U.S. Senate AI Insight Forum on doomsday scenarios in 2023.
Papers & key writings
Links
In the library
Nothing of theirs is filed in the hub yet. Browse the full library.
Recommended next
Hand-picked from the hub based on what Malo Bourgon covers.
How Much Should We Spend to Reduce A.I.'s Existential Risk?
Stanford economist Charles I. Jones works out, in plain economic terms, how much money it would be worth spending to lower catastrophic risks from advanced AI — comparing it to the roughly 4 percent of GDP the U.S. effectively spent during Covid-19.
Why this: Covers AI and AI safety too
Partnership on AI — resource library
Partnership on AI's open library of guidance, frameworks, and case studies on responsible AI: synthetic media, labor and the economy, AI safety, fairness, and inclusive AI development.
Why this: Covers AI and AI safety too
Import AI by Jack Clark
This weekly newsletter summarizes the latest artificial intelligence research and policy. You can read it to keep up with developments in AI technology.
Why this: Covers AI and policy too
Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart People
A skeptical 2016 talk by Maciej Ceglowski (Idle Words) that walks through the arguments for a superintelligence-driven intelligence explosion and takes them apart. Ceglowski compares the superintelligence risk debate to the Manhattan Project question of whether the first nuclear test could ignite the atmosphere, and argues that the core premises rest on speculative leaps rather than settled science. The talk was given at Web Camp Zagreb and is published as a full text transcript.
Why this: Covers AI and AI safety too