Fabien Curto Millet
Google's chief economist, focused on the economic impact of AI
Fabien Curto Millet is Google's chief economist. He joined the company in 2011 and leads the team that develops economic insights for Google, engages with regulators and policymakers, and works on the economic impact of AI and its consequences for the future of work. Before Google he was a senior consultant in NERA Economic Consulting's European competition policy practice. He earned a doctorate in economics at Oxford in 2006 and lectured in economics at Balliol College.
In the library
Nothing of theirs is filed in the hub yet. Browse the full library.
Recommended next
Hand-picked from the hub based on what Fabien Curto Millet covers.
Voice AI in Firms: A Natural Field Experiment on Automated Job Interviews
A September 2026 working paper by Brian Jabarian (Carnegie Mellon) and Luca Henkel (Erasmus Rotterdam) reporting a field experiment with 70,000 real applicants randomly assigned to be interviewed by a human recruiter or an AI voice agent. Applicants interviewed by AI were 12% more likely to receive an offer, with higher job starts and retention and no drop in on-the-job productivity. Transcript analysis traces the gain to more structured, consistent interviews that still adapt to each applicant.
Why this: Covers future of work and ai policy too
Windfall Policy Atlas
A catalog of policy proposals for responding to economic disruption from transformative AI, published by the Windfall Trust. Proposals are organized into five domains — public and social investments, labor market adaptation, wealth capture, regulation and market design, and global coordination — with a filterable page listing every policy.
Why this: Covers future of work and ai policy too
Public and Expert Predictions for AI's Next 20 Years (Pew Research Center)
Chapter 3 of Pew's April 2025 report comparing US adults with AI experts on what AI will do over the next two decades. 56% of the experts surveyed expect AI's impact on the US to be positive, against 17% of the public; 35% of adults expect a negative impact, against 15% of experts. The gap is widest on work and money: 73% of experts think AI will positively affect how people do their jobs versus 23% of the public, and 69% versus 21% on the economy, with a 40-point gap on medical care (84% versus 44%). Experts and the public broadly agree on the risks to democracy and journalism: only 11% of experts and 9% of the public expect AI to help elections, while 61% of experts and 50% of the public expect harm. Gender splits are large among experts — 63% of male experts predict a positive impact versus 36% of female experts. Free to read, with methodology and appendix tables.
Why this: Covers future of work and ai policy too
Forming an LLC or S-Corp for Your Tech Business or Consulting Practice
This guide explains how to set up an LLC or elect S-corp tax status for freelance and consulting work. You can use it to register your business, get a free tax ID, and understand your self-employment taxes.
Why this: Also about future of work